4

I just noticed. They are opposite of what I though they would be!!

Have a look: https://superuser.com/users/8829/eskay

1
  • 2
    Oh, god! That's the first time I've ever really looked at SuperUser. The colors! It burns us, precious!
    – Super Long Names are Hilarious
    Sep 27, 2009 at 9:19

1 Answer 1

1

I suspect it's just a sort ordered by (number of posts, name) that's descending, instead of ordering by number of posts descending and name ascending.

Given that this goes against the expected ordering, I think I'd call this a very minor bug. Mind you, the tags page itself doesn't seem to have any (obvious) secondary ordering...

2
  • Its ordered by ordering by "number of posts descending and name descending" See the tags with number of posts = 1
    – Lazer
    Sep 28, 2009 at 13:10
  • @eSKay: Yes, that's what I mean. I suspect that it's meant to be ascending in name.
    – Jon Skeet
    Sep 28, 2009 at 14:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .