Timeline for Should we bother closing old questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 10:46 | answer | added | TRiG | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 9, 2015 at 19:53 | answer | added | user | timeline score: 11 | |
| Oct 6, 2015 at 19:48 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/651484142446739456 | ||
| Oct 5, 2015 at 3:32 | answer | added | jww | timeline score: 10 | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 22:08 | comment | added | Ramhound | I vote on the material itself. It can be 5 years old submitted by the owner/creator of Stackexchange. If the answer/question should be deleted/closed I vote as such. I would vote on my own material if that were an option just as harshly. | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 20:22 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | Personally I'd say that if you'd have voted to close it if you'd seen it on the front page then you should vote to close it in the queue. I've closed a few questions that might have been okay back in the day but are now close-fodder. | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 18:55 | history | asked | fixer1234 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |