Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

I was going to flag this answerthis answer as “not an answer” (it’s little more than a bunch of links) when I noticed

that the “flagging” dialog box didn’t include the “very low quality” option:

which is available on other answers.

What’s special about this answer, that it cannot be flagged as VLQ?

I was going to flag this answer as “not an answer” (it’s little more than a bunch of links) when I noticed

that the “flagging” dialog box didn’t include the “very low quality” option:

which is available on other answers.

What’s special about this answer, that it cannot be flagged as VLQ?

I was going to flag this answer as “not an answer” (it’s little more than a bunch of links) when I noticed

that the “flagging” dialog box didn’t include the “very low quality” option:

which is available on other answers.

What’s special about this answer, that it cannot be flagged as VLQ?

edited tags
Link
Sathyajith Bhat Mod
  • 62.1k
  • 3
  • 54
  • 93
Source Link

*One* answer gets incomplete "flag" menu — cannot flag as VLQ

I was going to flag this answer as “not an answer” (it’s little more than a bunch of links) when I noticed

that the “flagging” dialog box didn’t include the “very low quality” option:

which is available on other answers.

What’s special about this answer, that it cannot be flagged as VLQ?