Timeline for *One* answer gets incomplete "flag" menu — cannot flag as VLQ
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2017 at 22:14 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | In response to my meta-follow up-meta question, “is this a new rule?”, I just now stumbled on this answer from 2011, in which Jeff Atwood♦ says “… we now only allow VLQ on posts with a score of zero or lower for the first seven days …” | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 23, 2015 at 4:47 | vote | accept | Scott - Слава Україні | ||
| Oct 20, 2015 at 11:08 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | Thanks for the link. The MSE question implicitly raises without resolving the meta-question: is this a new rule? (Starkeen has over a year tenure on the site, and he seemed to be as surprised as I was to stumble upon the abridged menu.) Oded(♦) asks the counter-question, “Why flag before voting? Voting is the first and most important thing to do.” I would respond, “Why vote before flagging? I don’t want the answer to sink to the bottom of the score-sorted list; I want to push it into a review queue, where my peers can vote to delete it.” Does having one more downvote get it deleted any faster? | |
| Oct 20, 2015 at 8:31 | history | answered | Sathyajith BhatMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |