Timeline for Two long answers disagreeing with each other - how to canonicalize?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Jun 2, 2016 at 7:45 | vote | accept | MarioDS | ||
| May 31, 2016 at 9:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/737580407420391428 | ||
| May 30, 2016 at 11:18 | comment | added | Tetsujin | That's fair - as @BenN says, citations would remove doubt in this instance. | |
| May 30, 2016 at 11:07 | comment | added | MarioDS | @Tetsujin for the time being, I've retracted it but have not applied it to the other answer since I'm not sure if it's correct either. | |
| May 30, 2016 at 10:09 | comment | added | Tetsujin | You also have the option of retracting the 'correct answer' flag & applying it to another answer. | |
| May 29, 2016 at 20:22 | comment | added | Ben Voigt | Why would you think that a mix of correct information and rubbish is better than allowing separate voting on two answers? FWIW, the new answer is correct; while the old one contains a lot of true facts they are almost totally unrelated to your question, and when it finally does address your question it is wrong on almost every critical detail. | |
| May 29, 2016 at 18:52 | answer | added | Ben N | timeline score: 33 | |
| May 29, 2016 at 18:03 | history | asked | MarioDS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |