Timeline for Edit new info into outdated answer or let new answer rise to the top
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Jun 23, 2016 at 21:24 | comment | added | Ramhound | @Mindwin Sounds like the new answer isn't all that great of it doesn't recieve up votes | |
| Jun 23, 2016 at 17:15 | comment | added | Mindwin Remember Monica | @Ramhound In an ideal world, yes. But very often people "follow the herd" and upvote what is already upvoted. And the gap is too wide | |
| Jun 23, 2016 at 15:08 | comment | added | SnoringFrog | @Mindwin which is often an issue with these types of scenarios, I've found | |
| Jun 23, 2016 at 14:34 | comment | added | Mindwin Remember Monica | We could get OP to mark the valid answer as accepted, but he is inactive for a long time. | |
| Jun 16, 2016 at 19:40 | answer | added | flurbius | timeline score: -2 | |
| Jun 15, 2016 at 4:01 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | The question is 5½ years old, and the 4th highest answer is 100 votes behind the highest one. What's the expectation of the time before the 4th one catches up to the top one? | |
| Jun 13, 2016 at 18:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/742422466832793600 | ||
| Jun 13, 2016 at 14:11 | vote | accept | SnoringFrog | ||
| Jun 11, 2016 at 5:46 | comment | added | Ramhound | If a new answer is valid, adds significant new information, and is a high-quality relative answer it will get upvotes | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 20:11 | answer | added | MokubaiMod | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 20:05 | history | asked | SnoringFrog | CC BY-SA 3.0 |