Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Aug 29, 2016 at 19:24 vote accept galacticninja
Aug 29, 2016 at 17:56 answer added Sathyajith BhatMod timeline score: 1
Aug 29, 2016 at 16:32 comment added fixer1234 I would go with galacticninja on this one. I think the older question is clearer, has more answers that people found useful, and the answers are better quality. The answers on the newer question are little more than links, including one covered better in the older question. Also, two of the answers on the older question do not require browser extensions.
Aug 29, 2016 at 12:50 comment added Ramhound I make specific reference to the reason I think the answer, with the quoted text, is higher quality. The question quality is about netural (IMO), the fact one was tweeted, has not effect on my opionion on the quality of the question.
Aug 29, 2016 at 6:44 comment added galacticninja @Ramhound I'd agree with merging. What made you say that the later-posted question was higher in quality? The first-posted question has more research info/effort in it. Tweeted or otherwise, the first question is clearly deemed better by the community, seeing that the later question has currently zero votes. Also, to discourage lower quality duplicates in the future, I believe we should mark the older question as the original.
Aug 29, 2016 at 6:39 history edited galacticninja CC BY-SA 3.0
added 169 characters in body
Aug 28, 2016 at 22:22 comment added Ramhound It only has more views because it was tweeted. It being tweeted and thus more views (which leads to more votes) isn't a good reason to switch the duplicate flags around. If anything the questions should be merged, since I partially agree, the answer the quotes the purpose of the add-on is a higher quality, but the question isn't, so its a complete wash.
Aug 28, 2016 at 6:39 history asked galacticninja CC BY-SA 3.0