Timeline for Edit Recommendations
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
Oct 19, 2016 at 7:52 | comment | added | Burgi | Yes I did notice that. | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 0:23 | comment | added | Braiam | The answer was deleted. | |
Oct 16, 2016 at 1:03 | comment | added | Burgi | Good question, I have the feeling that they would. | |
Oct 15, 2016 at 20:39 | comment | added | Braiam | The real question here is: if it wasn't a self answer, would the moderator delete it? | |
Oct 11, 2016 at 9:14 | comment | added | fixer1234 | If they provide any useful information, that's gravy, even if it is a low quality answer. If the question can't be definitively solved without OP input, they don't explain their solution, and whatever they post indicates that the problem can no longer be replicated, that may mean that the whole thread is useless, so it may be a candidate for closure. | |
Oct 11, 2016 at 9:11 | comment | added | fixer1234 | We have a huge number of questions with no disposition. We don't know if there is even still a problem. There is value in having the OP close the loop on the question, even if that doesn't include a clear description of the solution. So even if the OP just posts, "I solved the problem", I let it go as an answer because it documents the disposition and lets people know that solutions are no longer required. However, I suggest in a comment that it would be helpful to others if they could add an explanation of what the solution was. (Cont'd) | |
Oct 11, 2016 at 7:31 | answer | added | Máté Juhász | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 19:44 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | Hmm. OP is still (kind of) around "Last seen Sep 29 at 21:40". I would just leave it for the OP to edit. | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 18:57 | history | asked | Burgi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |