Timeline for What should happen to a question which the OP realised was not necessary?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 10, 2016 at 22:54 | comment | added | Ramhound | We should encourage the author to fix his question then submit an answer to it | |
| Dec 10, 2016 at 19:11 | comment | added | 3N1GM4 | So should we encourage the OP to repost his comment as an answer in this specific instance, or what? As he's identified the cause of the issue (which it's unlikely anyone else would have without further information), the question will go unanswered otherwise. Also, I wasn't saying it was a stupid question, just one which is going to remain unanswered unless someone does something. | |
| Dec 10, 2016 at 18:34 | history | answered | allquixotic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |