Return to Answer

The original sentence was a little confusing: "To get a list names ever exited in monthly worksheet."

I changed it to: "To get a list of all names ever exited in each monthly worksheet."

You failed to identify that exited isn't the correct word grammatically. The author was looking to use existed. Even the correct word, that the author meant to use, is a poor word to use which means a different word should have been suggested (i.e the word created or generated).

I think it's much easier to read if it uses correct grammar, especially because I made sure not to change the original intent.

I don't agree with your conclusion. You failed to address even half of the grammatical mistakes in the answer.

Again, you may need formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

Should have been:

Again, you may need a formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

You failed to identify the grammatical mistake in this sentence.

Once the full name list is got, later monthly update can be appending name list from new monthly to old full name list then re-filter it.

Should have been:

Once the full name list is determined, future monthly updates can be append the name list from the previous month's list and then re-filter it.

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

Should have been:

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in the monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

I would like to add, even my suggested corrections to the author's extremely poor answer, does not address all the issues it has. Most of the original sentences don't actually make sense. The quality of that particular answer is extremely poor.

The original sentence was a little confusing: "To get a list names ever exited in monthly worksheet."

I changed it to: "To get a list of all names ever exited in each monthly worksheet."

You failed to identify that exited isn't the correct word grammatically. The author was looking to use existed. Even the correct word, that the author meant to use, is a poor word to use which means a different word should have been suggested (i.e the word created or generated).

I think it's much easier to read if it uses correct grammar, especially because I made sure not to change the original intent.

I don't agree with your conclusion. You failed to address even half of the grammatical mistakes in the answer.

Again, you may need formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

Should have been:

Again, you may need a formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

You failed to identify the grammatical mistake in this sentence.

Once the full name list is got, later monthly update can be appending name list from new monthly to old full name list then re-filter it.

Should have been:

Once the full name list is determined, future monthly updates can append the name list from the previous month's list and then re-filter it.

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

Should have been:

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in the monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

I would like to add, even my suggested corrections to the author's extremely poor answer, does not address all the issues it has. Most of the original sentences don't actually make sense. The quality of that particular answer is extremely poor.

The original sentence was a little confusing: "To get a list names ever exited in monthly worksheet."

I changed it to: "To get a list of all names ever exited in each monthly worksheet."

You failed to identify that exited isn't the correct word grammatically. The author was looking to use existed. Even the correct word, that the author meant to use, is a poor word to use which means a different word should have been suggested (i.e the word created or generated). You failed to correct all grammatical mistakes in the answer.

I think it's much easier to read if it uses correct grammar, especially because I made sure not to change the original intent.

I don't agree with your conclusion. You failed to address even half of the grammatical mistakes in the answer.

Again, you may need formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

Should have been:

Again, you may need a formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

You failed to identify the grammatical mistake in this sentence.

Once the full name list is got, later monthly update can be appending name list from new monthly to old full name list then re-filter it.

Should have been:

Once the full name list is determined, future monthly updates can be append the name list from the previous month's list and then re-filter it.

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

Should have been:

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in the monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

I would like to add, even my suggested corrections to the author's extremely poor answer, does not address all the issues it has. Most of the original sentences don't actually make sense. The quality of that particular answer is extremely poor.

The original sentence was a little confusing: "To get a list names ever exited in monthly worksheet."

I changed it to: "To get a list of all names ever exited in each monthly worksheet."

You failed to identify that exited isn't the correct word grammatically. The author was looking to use existed. Even the correct word, that the author meant to use, is a poor word to use which means a different word should have been suggested (i.e the word created or generated).

I think it's much easier to read if it uses correct grammar, especially because I made sure not to change the original intent.

I don't agree with your conclusion. You failed to address even half of the grammatical mistakes in the answer.

Again, you may need formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

Should have been:

Again, you may need a formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

You failed to identify the grammatical mistake in this sentence.

Once the full name list is got, later monthly update can be appending name list from new monthly to old full name list then re-filter it.

Should have been:

Once the full name list is determined, future monthly updates can be append the name list from the previous month's list and then re-filter it.

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

Should have been:

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in the monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

I would like to add, even my suggested corrections to the author's extremely poor answer, does not address all the issues it has. Most of the original sentences don't actually make sense. The quality of that particular answer is extremely poor.

The original sentence was a little confusing: "To get a list names ever exited in monthly worksheet."

I changed it to: "To get a list of all names ever exited in each monthly worksheet."

You failed to identify that exited isn't the correct word grammatically. The author was looking to use existed. Even the correct word, that the author meant to use, is a poor word to use which means a different word should have been suggested (i.e the word created). You failed to correct all grammatical mistakes in the answer.

I think it's much easier to read if it uses correct grammar, especially because I made sure not to change the original intent.

I don't agree with your conclusion. You failed to address even half of the grammatical mistakes in the answer.

Again, you may need formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

You failed to identify the grammatical mistake in this sentence.

Again, you may need a formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

Once the full name list is got, later monthly update can be appending name list from new monthly to old full name list then re-filter it.

You failed to identify the grammatical mistake in this sentence.

Once the full name list is determined, future monthly updates can be append the name list from the previous month's list and then re-filter it.

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

You failed to identify the grammatical mistake in this sentence.

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in the monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

The original sentence was a little confusing: "To get a list names ever exited in monthly worksheet."

I changed it to: "To get a list of all names ever exited in each monthly worksheet."

You failed to identify that exited isn't the correct word grammatically. The author was looking to use existed. Even the correct word, that the author meant to use, is a poor word to use which means a different word should have been suggested (i.e the word created or generated). You failed to correct all grammatical mistakes in the answer.

I think it's much easier to read if it uses correct grammar, especially because I made sure not to change the original intent.

I don't agree with your conclusion. You failed to address even half of the grammatical mistakes in the answer.

Again, you may need formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

Should have been:

Again, you may need a formula like if(isna(vlookup(...)), "", vlookup(...) to get rid of the #N/A text when a given name not found for some specific months.

You failed to identify the grammatical mistake in this sentence.

Once the full name list is got, later monthly update can be appending name list from new monthly to old full name list then re-filter it.

Should have been:

Once the full name list is determined, future monthly updates can be append the name list from the previous month's list and then re-filter it.

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

Should have been:

From a database's point of view, this is in fact to get a union of name lists in the monthly worksheet (including removing the duplicates);

I would like to add, even my suggested corrections to the author's extremely poor answer, does not address all the issues it has. Most of the original sentences don't actually make sense. The quality of that particular answer is extremely poor.