Timeline for Purpose of "very low quality" flag of questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 14, 2018 at 5:50 | comment | added | fosslinux | just love the flagged answer | |
Sep 8, 2018 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/1038306143221755905 | ||
Sep 7, 2018 at 18:24 | comment | added | Máté Juhász | @Dylan: I've never seen any question deleted which was deleted. Those are closed as off-topic / too-broad / unclear... | |
Sep 7, 2018 at 18:10 | comment | added | Dylan | Generally for a VLQQ it has to be a question. This was nothing more than several "sentences". | |
Sep 4, 2018 at 10:55 | comment | added | Mokubai Mod | @MátéJuhász I would argue the opposite, someone who is intentionally rude and abusive will tend to remain so, someone who simply doesn't know the rules and needs to be shown how to ask good questions generally are more amenable to being shown the error of their ways. | |
Sep 4, 2018 at 10:15 | comment | added | Máté Juhász | @JourneymanGeek: that's true, however there is a higher chance to save a rude post than for a VLQ, still rude is in the same category as spam. | |
Sep 4, 2018 at 10:14 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | You can save a VLQ post. You usually can't save spam | |
Sep 4, 2018 at 9:11 | vote | accept | Máté Juhász | ||
Sep 4, 2018 at 8:04 | answer | added | MokubaiMod | timeline score: 11 | |
Sep 4, 2018 at 7:29 | history | asked | Máté Juhász | CC BY-SA 4.0 |