Timeline for Was my suspension for commenting called for?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2021 at 23:44 | comment | added | Ramhound | @Shayan - They requested their profile be deleted. | |
| Nov 24, 2020 at 9:40 | comment | added | Shayan | Was this person banned? They don't seem to have a profile anymore. | |
| Nov 20, 2020 at 0:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/super_user/status/1329575233083371522 | ||
| Nov 18, 2020 at 19:33 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 17, 2020 at 4:54 | answer | added | Vylix | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 16, 2020 at 15:54 | history | edited | user596332 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 925 characters in body
|
| Nov 16, 2020 at 15:49 | answer | added | Dmitry Grigoryev | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 16, 2020 at 11:19 | answer | added | Tetsujin | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 15, 2020 at 13:36 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Nov 15, 2020 at 13:07 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 15, 2020 at 21:44 | |||||
| Nov 15, 2020 at 13:02 | comment | added | Kamil Maciorowski | Here on Meta often upvotes/downvotes indicate if voters agree or disagree. In this case I'm upvoting the question not because I agree with you (read my answer to see if I do), but because I think it's an interesting question and I can learn from the entire situation. | |
| Nov 15, 2020 at 12:57 | answer | added | Kamil Maciorowski | timeline score: 14 | |
| Nov 14, 2020 at 17:33 | comment | added | Donald Duck | Why don't you suggest an edit removing the sentence that's incorrect? | |
| Nov 14, 2020 at 16:11 | comment | added | Ramhound | If your answer would have been out of scope for the question, then you must realize, your comment was also out of scope. This is the reason it was originally flagged, it only became a problem, when you kept submitting the same warning multiple times. | |
| Nov 14, 2020 at 15:59 | comment | added | Ramhound | @Quasímodo - Yes; You submit your warning once, with a downvote, and you move on. You could have answered the question and provided a better solution. | |
| Nov 14, 2020 at 15:29 | answer | added | Journeyman GeekMod | timeline score: 9 | |
| Nov 14, 2020 at 14:34 | history | edited | user596332 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
The previous comments were ten according to the moderator, not five
|
| Nov 14, 2020 at 14:24 | history | edited | user596332 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added more clarity to the comments/deletion events
|
| Nov 14, 2020 at 6:35 | comment | added | Ramhound | “I have flagged your comment and I'll keep posting my warning.” Yes; The comment you voted for should have been reported, but continuing to submit the same comment, isn’t allowed either. | |
| Nov 14, 2020 at 6:32 | comment | added | Ramhound | “I added comments explaining that, in Linux, neither is that the only nor the best alternative as long as there is a Sysrq key.” - So instead of submitting an answer you submitted unnecessary commentary about a operating system that had nothing to do with the question? You could have just issued a downvote. I trust the moderator, in that there is more to those other comments, you didn’t bother to provide | |
| Nov 13, 2020 at 17:10 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | its a question about Macs. Unless the question asks for all systems, answer pertaining to behaviour about non Macs would be irrelevant | |
| Nov 13, 2020 at 16:31 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | there's a chain of 10 comments prior to the ones posted above where you kept badgering about a key that's not on a Mac keyboard, esp when Mac is specifically called out on in the question, even after being acknowledged by OP and updated the answer after the second comment. That's my definition of harassment, tbh. | |
| Nov 13, 2020 at 15:55 | history | edited | user596332 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed a not directly related fact.
|
| Nov 13, 2020 at 15:14 | history | asked | user596332 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |