Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 17, 2022 at 15:00 history tweeted twitter.com/super_user/status/1593257696572346373
Nov 13, 2022 at 7:28 vote accept NotTheDr01ds
Nov 13, 2022 at 6:24 comment added Ramhound I lost track of the number of questions that are simply unanswerable since they don't contain the information necessary to answer them. If you don't agree with a vote closure, vote to reopen the question, after you improve the question of course.
Nov 11, 2022 at 21:08 answer added NotTheDr01ds timeline score: 11
Nov 11, 2022 at 19:49 comment added harrymc I have also lost count of how many mod-closed as duplicate I don't agree with.
Nov 10, 2022 at 23:17 history became hot meta post
Nov 10, 2022 at 18:17 comment added DavidPostill Mod @NotTheDr01ds Done
Nov 10, 2022 at 17:38 comment added NotTheDr01ds @DavidPostill Since Ramhound VTC'd already as "Needs details", it's not possible to change it to the duplicate. Can you or another mod make the adjustment directly?
Nov 10, 2022 at 13:14 comment added DavidPostill Mod reopened as ramhound has found a potential duplicate
Nov 10, 2022 at 13:12 comment added NotTheDr01ds @Ramhound And on that, I know we disagree. "4" can be the answer to "What is 2 + 2?", or "What is 2 * 2?" (or hundreds of other questions), but that does not make those question duplicates of each other.
Nov 10, 2022 at 13:10 comment added Ramhound But the new question is vague, had they provided a screenshot, I probably would have identified it was a possible duplicate. Question duplicates are about the question’s answers not the question body (or their titles). (As a gold tag in Windows 10 I could have flagged it as a duplicate despite it itself being closed). But it’s not in a state where I would vote to reopen currently. I might even specifically answer the question, but again, not in a state where I personally would vote to reopen.
Nov 10, 2022 at 13:08 history edited NotTheDr01ds CC BY-SA 4.0
Update duplicate possibility
Nov 10, 2022 at 13:04 comment added NotTheDr01ds @Ramhound Now that one I could see being a duplicate for this one, based on the title alone. And in that case, because the question body asked about Python, yes, I can see it being a duplicate of the other Python question.
Nov 10, 2022 at 13:01 comment added Ramhound I have closed a question that literally asked about the 0-byte files as a duplicate of that question before here and nobody has voted to reopen it after 3 years.
Nov 10, 2022 at 12:58 comment added NotTheDr01ds @Ramhound Eh, I don't see it. There is nothing in that proposed duplicate question that talks about either that particular directory or 0-byte files. There are other questions here about specific App Execution Aliases and their behavior, but this particular question doesn't appear to be a duplicate of any that I could find.
Nov 10, 2022 at 12:56 comment added Ramhound If it was to be reopened I would just immediately flag it as a duplicate of this question. I disagree had there been a screenshot of the files I would have identified it as being the application alias folder, I know a lot, but not always immediately.
Nov 10, 2022 at 12:54 comment added NotTheDr01ds @Ramhound As mentioned above, there is simply no need to even list a single .exe for the question to be clear and answered.
Nov 10, 2022 at 12:53 comment added Ramhound The user failed to even list the name of one of the executables, that was the sole reason, I voted to closed. As the reason I didn’t submit a complaint asking for that information, that’s because of how toxic new users, often are to feedback. The author can easily edit their question to get it reopened
Nov 10, 2022 at 12:50 history asked NotTheDr01ds CC BY-SA 4.0