Timeline for Why are there only few choices for flagging inappriopriate site of the network?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2023 at 9:16 | vote | accept | Destroy666 | ||
| May 8, 2023 at 11:11 | comment | added | Tetsujin | Before I saw this, I'd already raised a new question on what might be done with the software recs close explanation. meta.superuser.com/questions/15008/… Personally, I'm with the majority here that simply migrating doesn't help 'fix' a question to that target stack. Better for the user to ask in a way that fits that site properly. The link is just asking for a better way to inform them of that. | |
| May 4, 2023 at 2:00 | answer | added | Wicket | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 3, 2023 at 11:47 | history | edited | Destroy666 |
Proposed comment tags
|
|
| Apr 18, 2023 at 5:40 | comment | added | DavidPostill Mod | Only 5 are allowed under the current site configuration - I think that limit applies to all SE sites. | |
| Apr 18, 2023 at 2:04 | comment | added | Ramhound | Limitation of the platform, and in all honesty, most content that is migrated is ultimately rejected by the target community. Ultimately, it’s better for the author of the out of scope content, to have it deleted so they can have it submitted. Most users fail to identify content that should be improved before it’s migrated, and most users, ultimately don’t improve their contributions so I can be migrated. The fact users, fail to determine what’s within scope, is ultimately on them. I feel I am under not demand, to improve content, that should never have been submitted in the first place | |
| Apr 18, 2023 at 1:39 | history | asked | Destroy666 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |