Timeline for Being a scriptkiddy is OK but piracy is not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2023 at 4:42 | comment | added | user1482432 | @VomitIT-ChunkyMessStyle In this case it is clearly proven otherwise, see OP. I've seen posts closed in cases where people bought a key from a reseller. Quite a few people do not know that those resellers illegally resell Windows/Office keys. | |
| Nov 30, 2023 at 3:12 | comment | added | Vomit IT - Chunky Mess Style | @Gantendo I believe this implies that posts are treated as innocent until proven otherwise, regardless of how closely the technical inquiry aligns with something that could potentially be used for malicious purposes. Strive to conform and adhere to prevent any perception of singling out or accusing posts of harboring malicious intent. There's a possibility that I've assisted someone with a script here that could be utilized for criminal activities, highlighting one of the downsides of this sort of platform and shared content – every action comes with its pros and cons. | |
| Nov 22, 2023 at 11:18 | comment | added | user1482432 | Oh and for the record, you can't force people to actually assume good faith but you can force them to pretend to. I've seen it happen. This led to people being very creative with words and accusing others while maintaining (somewhat) plausible deniability. The most toxic and problematic people thrived, they could no longer be accused of doing what they did and they knew how to accuse others without saying the magic words, just like they were masters at insulting people without using swearwords. Writing a workable CoC is impossible for people less jaded than I am. | |
| Nov 22, 2023 at 10:25 | comment | added | user1482432 | We both know digital clocks are never right. Google Collection #1-5 & Zabagur ;-) I've been following scriptkiddy lore since before VX heaven | |
| Nov 22, 2023 at 10:25 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | Clearly digital. | |
| Nov 22, 2023 at 10:23 | comment | added | user1482432 | I like you Journeyman Geek, but in this case you are clearly and obviously wrong. Falsely claiming I demanded something and harangued the user is, ironically, not assuming good faith. I get it; you don't know what I know. But if you did you would act differently. And you don't seem to take into account the possibility that I know what I am talking about (in this very specific and limited case) and you do not. I am the broken clock that is right once a millenium. | |
| Nov 22, 2023 at 10:15 | comment | added | user1482432 | Its not the use of regex that's suspicious, its the fact that dude has dumps that he is using for credential stuffing. I didn't harangue the user; I pointed out something very obvious to anyone who knows about these things. Sure, you've done ungodly things to text files, but in this particular case this particular operation can only mean one thing. And if you would have experience with that you would know what he is doing and why. | |
| Nov 22, 2023 at 10:14 | comment | added | user1482432 | You sure I demanded something? Doesn't sound like me... Like we say on Wikipedia: "assume good faith isn't a suicide pact". I'll happily assume good faith if there is any theoretical hypothetical scenario where things might not be as they seem. In this case it is very obvious (especially combined with the other questions the user has posted) that assuming good faith would be misplaced. | |
| Nov 22, 2023 at 10:00 | history | answered | Journeyman GeekMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |