Timeline for We need an 'AI generated' choice for flagging answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29 at 0:26 | comment | added | Ramhound | I can only guess, what is actually displayed when a moderator reviews a NAA flag, but based on the comments when a flagged is denied then a question about the flag is raised the responses typically suggest a custom moderator flag would have been more helpful. So, I suspect often not enough information is displayed. Furthermore, we might not have a problem with our moderators not acting on AI generated content, but I know other communities are not as lucky as we are. | |
| Feb 29 at 0:22 | comment | added | Ramhound | @user13267 - I think the real problem is that when an answer is flagged as NAA, what is displayed to the moderator, is not enough information to determine if it is or isn't an answer. I have long suspected there often is not enough context, when something is flagged and reviewed by a moderator. A moderator most certainly can open the question in another tab, but for the same reasons the review system now displays more information, it shouldn't be required to do so. All relevant information in the context of the flag should be displayed. IMO | |
| Feb 27 at 22:41 | history | edited | Robotnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
better tagging; some minor tweaks to grammar
|
| Feb 26 at 3:50 | comment | added | user13267 | .."Not an answer", which is the actual problem here, rather than getting hung up on ai. If I had posted something similar to that deleted answer before chatgpt had been around, it would still have been an NAA. Advent of ai just made it easier to find somewhere to copy it from, but the real problem is still NAA | |
| Feb 26 at 3:50 | comment | added | user13267 | @JW0914 I agree that a random users determination of what is or isnt ai should not be used as a basis to judge an answer. That being said, this question has a now deleted answer that are just generic steps to solve a problem similar to what was asked (kind of like suggesting "have you tried turning it off an on?") but didnt actually focus on solving what was asked. While that answer was most likely generated by an ai (I could get 60% same answer pasting the question into chatgpt), I think this should be considered a different category of ... | |
| Feb 23 at 20:26 | comment | added | user1482432 | @JW0914 Bad news buddy, your intelligence is competely artificial | |
| Feb 23 at 12:58 | comment | added | JW0914 | How is an arbitrary user deeming questions and answers as potentially AI generated? For example, I make heavy use of man page links (some more complex answers have in excess or twenty) and content within outline-style formatted answers , and I've had comments asking if it was written by an AI. It would seem prudent to first develop a reference point so there's a consensus on what could be AI generated, versus leaving it up to each arbitrary user's personal interpretation of "AI generated" - it's not implausible such a choice is added with a majority of votes being false positives. | |
| Feb 22 at 6:28 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | We don't really have so much flag volume that a custom flag is out of the question | |
| Feb 22 at 5:57 | history | asked | user67275 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |