Timeline for Please don't migrate game recommendations to Gaming
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:10 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 9:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Dec 28, 2010 at 14:52 | history | edited | Grace NoteStaffMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Update as promised, even if somewhat tardy. ♪
|
| Dec 9, 2010 at 16:23 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | @random Then we'll start picketing on your lawn. But in seriosity, there is enough difference between the nature of an identification question (seeking 1 answer) and a recommendation question (seeking all applicable answers), and we are already imposing increased scrutiny on identification questions. A recommendation that can pass off as an identification is going to be overly vague and broad by the standards that identification should be judged on. | |
| Dec 9, 2010 at 16:02 | comment | added | random Mod | What if we just edit the post to be more like "identify this game" type posts which last heard are for some reason welcome? | |
| Dec 8, 2010 at 20:02 | answer | added | Ivo FlipseMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| Dec 8, 2010 at 14:07 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | @DMA That was the trigger point, aye, but I lacked the capacity to post a comment (as it is locked). I can accept there being a lack of visibility to this request, but my hope is that those who do read this can inform users who didn't, should this come up again. Some word is better than no word, and I like to be proactive even if it isn't even a real problem yet. I also don't blame anyone if they do get migrated (I just hope to reduce its frequency); Super User has good reason to disallow Gaming, and we have your own Ivo Flipse to thank for helping us understand a lot about your site. | |
| Dec 8, 2010 at 14:03 | comment | added | DMA57361 | I presume this question is triggered by the migration of this question? I think I voted to just close it, but obviously these things work on a majority (or moderator override, obviously). I think you may find you have an underlying problem here - meta.SU doesn't feel particularly active so I imagine many 3k SU users won't see this post, and any of those non-meta-reading 3k SU users that don't use gaming won't even know there is a problem... | |
| Dec 8, 2010 at 13:43 | history | edited | Grace NoteStaffMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
I decided to remove that qualifier and update our FAQ to reflect this process, anyway, but nevertheless...
|
| Dec 8, 2010 at 13:20 | history | asked | Grace NoteStaffMod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |