Timeline for Reduce community wiki force threshold to <= 15 answers on superuser?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 17:57 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jul 22, 2009 at 10:10 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | I did bump the limit up to 15, as 10 seemed a little low. | |
| Jul 19, 2009 at 14:59 | comment | added | richardhoskins | The question may be a black swan, but I still feel aggrieved. There are all sorts of things going on in Superuser that may have contributed to the large number of answers. People not being reputable enough to edit or comment on existing answers, for example. | |
| Jul 19, 2009 at 9:41 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | ok so maybe 10 is a little low, and we can adjust it to 15. That's a freakishly large number of answers in my experience, so I'm not sure it's representative. Now if you could point me to a half-dozen other examples, perhaps.. | |
| Jul 19, 2009 at 0:41 | comment | added | richardhoskins | I will start to do that. | |
| Jul 19, 2009 at 0:34 | comment | added | Shog9 | OT, but you should probably downvote wrong answers to avoid confusing future readers... | |
| Jul 18, 2009 at 23:47 | history | answered | Richard Hoskins | CC BY-SA 2.5 |