Timeline for Is it okay to inform users to stop promoting Apple.SE when a question is fine to stay here?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
Mar 30, 2015 at 17:52 | comment | added | Sun | If Apple is for apple hardware/software and superuser is for computer hardware/software, there seems to be a lot of overlap in terms of where questions about apple hardware/software can belong in. Long term, I feel SU becomes a dumping ground for questions that are better organized in Apple, Linux, etc. It seems SU receives enough questions that are better grafted into other exchanges that now exist to serve that community. | |
Mar 22, 2012 at 19:37 | history | edited | nhinkleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added info from new official blog post
|
Aug 16, 2011 at 21:16 | comment | added | bmike | This response has to be the best explanation I've seen how to treat an overlap in scope between two sites. It shows great conviction to split your Mac OS X questions over two sites, but with policy like this it looks like a worthy experiment with good chances of success. | |
Jul 22, 2011 at 7:17 | vote | accept | slhck | ||
Jul 21, 2011 at 22:07 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | yeah no nagging please. If you feel a question is a much better fit there, then explain why in the comment.. but simple, mindless repetition of "contains the word Apple, must belong elsewhere" is not welcome. | |
Jul 21, 2011 at 22:07 | history | edited | nhinkleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
Jul 21, 2011 at 22:02 | history | answered | nhinkleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |