Timeline for Help us clean up Super User
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2018 at 21:22 | comment | added | Scott - Слава Україні | Note that the “Super User Vote to Close/Delete” chat room was deleted about six years ago. | |
| Aug 18, 2011 at 17:15 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | More ammo for deleting stuff: blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/01/adventures-in-delclusionism | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 22:31 | answer | added | Tamara Wijsman | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 17:53 | comment | added | soandos | I was not talking about for me. I meant for people like slhck (he said this: used up all of my deletion votes, sorry @soandos :P in chat) | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 17:10 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod | @soandos I don't believe you have any deletion votes yet, correct? If you mean increase the number of flags, then yes - the number of flags you have is proportional to your flag weight. | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 14:52 | comment | added | soandos | Is there a chance that the number of deletion votes be increased? | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 5:46 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod | @Sathya quicker link to infinite flag weight | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 4:34 | comment | added | Sathyajith Bhat Mod | Shortcut to infinite flag weight | |
| Aug 17, 2011 at 1:14 | comment | added | Gareth | Regarding the "historical" questions, I agree with @Ivo and think we should just take a hard line. If I come across any now I'll be flagging them for deletion. | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 22:39 | comment | added | slhck |
All closed questions on the site? You can use the search operator closed:1. More on that here. If you want to find all questions that are closed as a duplicate of X, I wouldn't know how to do that though @soandos
|
|
| Aug 16, 2011 at 22:32 | comment | added | soandos | Is there a way to view all closed questions? | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 22:30 | comment | added | slhck | Depends on the question type. I'd suggest to look out for the most popular one -- or the one containing the most useful answers, i.e. material to work with. It's what I did here. Then clean it up. Ideally all would point to one master post by the means of closing it as a duplicate, so it is properly referenced by the system. Making the "master post" CW is something I personally strongly support. @soandos | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 22:15 | comment | added | soandos | How can one determine which post is a signpost (for the duplicates)? Should there be a note on the master, and then just have everything go to that? Or should the master post be made community wiki? | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:56 | answer | added | slhck | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:21 | comment | added | slhck | Exactly what I was thinking. For a better picture, I'll drop the link here: What should we do with outdated, but highly-popular questions? | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:19 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | We can salvage the content as a blog post if need be, but honestly I think these broken windows only set a bad example. They were closed because we don't want these kind of questions, then we shouldn't chicken out and keep them around either. If there's any value in these questions, we should ask a new question that does meet our standards and the valuable information can be used in answers on the new question. | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:15 | comment | added | slhck | What about the "good old" (now closed but) highly popular posts that are there "for historical reasons"? | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:08 | history | edited | nhinkleMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 260 characters in body
|
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:02 | history | asked | Ivo FlipseMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |