Timeline for How can we take care of our old duplicates?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Oct 12, 2011 at 7:49 | comment | added | Psycogeek | At some point a person might analise how the format or practices can turn people off so badly, that they Dont even show up, to ask or answer questions. My vote would be to continue the Dumping process. I would rather have my question dropped down into "stupid endlessly repeated User" section :-) As oppoesed to be in the "We already know that shut-up" section. :-) | |
| Oct 6, 2011 at 0:41 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSuper_User/status/121746837425229826 | ||
| Oct 3, 2011 at 23:44 | answer | added | nhinkleMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 3, 2011 at 13:09 | answer | added | Daniel BeckMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Oct 3, 2011 at 8:23 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | The question then should be edited to apply more broadly, if necessary. That's a given. For many questions, it probably won't make much of a difference. It needs to be decided case by case anyway. | |
| Oct 3, 2011 at 8:20 | comment | added | slhck | Works for some cases. For others, if the OP or the answers failed to generalize the problem statement, it would lead to confusion though. | |
| Oct 3, 2011 at 8:18 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | The moderators need to hit that merge button more often. | |
| Oct 3, 2011 at 7:16 | history | asked | slhck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |