Timeline for Having fun the the post editor [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2012 at 23:34 | vote | accept | iglvzx | ||
| Jan 1, 2012 at 1:23 | history | edited | iglvzx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2011 at 23:07 | history | edited | iglvzx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 31, 2011 at 23:01 | history | edited | iglvzx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 176 characters in body; edited title
|
| Dec 31, 2011 at 15:28 | history | edited | iglvzx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body; added 1 characters in body; edited body; edited title
|
| Dec 31, 2011 at 15:21 | history | edited | iglvzx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body; added 1 characters in body; edited body
|
| Dec 31, 2011 at 15:07 | comment | added | Pylsa | @DanielBeck I'm already looking for one! I can't remember any but I know for sure I saw them. | |
| Dec 31, 2011 at 15:06 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | @RedhattedCatsaysBestWishes Interesting. Could you provide an example for that? | |
| Dec 31, 2011 at 15:05 | comment | added | Pylsa | @DanielBeck The system inserts HTML comments for future editors if a question is edited by the system (E.g. applied filters, etc.) | |
| Dec 31, 2011 at 15:00 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | @RedhattedCatsaysBestWishes Interesting about HTML comments is, they don't become part of the output either. I didn't know that. | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:57 | history | closed |
Pylsa slhck studiohackMod |
noise or pointless | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:36 | comment | added | slhck |
I think this should be status-bydesigned ;) — nice find though!
|
|
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:20 | answer | added | Daniel BeckMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:14 | comment | added | iglvzx | @RedhattedCatsaysBestWishes I know. :) | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:11 | comment | added | Pylsa | @iglzvx I understand! I genuinely think it's funny to do, but an active question about it doesn't serve any purpose I think! Nothing personal! (: | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:10 | comment | added | iglvzx | @RedhattedCatsaysBestWishes I'm just having fun. I understand this is not a valid topic. | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:09 | history | edited | Pylsa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:08 | comment | added | iglvzx | @DanielBeck Heck. You can even reference them, but they do not show. | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:08 | comment | added | Pylsa | I don't really see why this should be discussed though. One can simply put in HTML-comment tags as well. Voting to close, don't really see the point in this. | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:06 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | @nhinkle Click the edit link. He uses unreferenced footnote-style image/URL definitions. | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:05 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod | Can you give an example? I don't understand what you mean. | |
| Dec 30, 2011 at 20:04 | history | asked | iglvzx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |