Timeline for Why is looking for alternative programs "not constructive"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
37 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Sep 25, 2012 at 5:10 | comment | added | Superbest | @sidran32 There is very little on the Stack Exchange network that you cannot ("eventually") find elsewhere. The point is that it has high signal to noise (which puts it ahead of 90% of other places) and is likelier to solve your particular problem rather than giving general solutions (which disqualifies another 9%). Linux questions aren't forbidden because Linuxforums and man pages exist. | |
| Jun 9, 2012 at 14:56 | comment | added | barlop | when a question doesn't fit the rules then they just make some obtuse comment when closing it, like "this is not a real question". It is annoying when they call recommendations "shopping", but just more of the obtuse comments made when things don't fit their rules. The real reason is that in their system I suppose they don't like a question to be constantly active. | |
| Feb 18, 2012 at 8:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSuper_User/status/170786669379846144 | ||
| Feb 17, 2012 at 1:18 | history | unlocked | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 17, 2012 at 1:18 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 16, 2012 at 0:55 | history | notice added | randomMod | Content dispute | |
| Feb 16, 2012 at 0:55 | history | locked | randomMod | ||
| Feb 16, 2012 at 0:55 | history | rollback | randomMod |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Feb 16, 2012 at 0:54 | history | notice removed | randomMod | ||
| Feb 16, 2012 at 0:54 | history | unlocked | randomMod | ||
| Feb 15, 2012 at 23:53 | history | notice added | randomMod | Content dispute | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 23:53 | history | locked | randomMod | ||
| Feb 15, 2012 at 22:54 | comment | added | user541686 | @slhck: Yup, I'm fine with the current version. | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 22:50 | vote | accept | user541686 | ||
| Feb 15, 2012 at 22:44 | comment | added | slhck | Please stop rolling back all the time – I don't think anybody else would really think this one sentence is something worth making a big fuss over. Is it okay to move on from here, guys? This question is more or less answered. /cc @tom | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 20:46 | comment | added | user541686 | @TomWijsman: If you really don't enjoy getting pinged, then stop changing my post. But if you enjoy the attention you're getting (and you like deleting and re-posting comments like you already have done) then by all means, feel free to continue. | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 20:46 | history | rollback | user541686 |
Rollback to Revision 6
|
|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 19:44 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
The example I just removed is what _you_ specified yourself, please stop putting your non-sense BS in my mouth...
|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 19:42 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | When will you stop? Did you really feel it's necessary to ping me once again? | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 18:50 | history | rollback | user541686 |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 18:22 | history | rollback | Tamara Wijsman |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 17:45 | comment | added | user541686 | @TomWijsman: I must say your continued edits are quite frustrating. I understand you want to remove the site, but can't you at least chill down and leave my meta post alone? If people don't like it, they can downvote it, and if I look like a jerk, then that's my problem, not yours. But I'm sure you already know (as this is obviously intentional), so far, your edits have only served to put (or in this case, remove) words from my mouth, to make my posts work to your personal advantage... so I'd appreciate it if you followed your own policies and didn't change the meanings of (meta) posts. | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 17:42 | history | rollback | user541686 |
Rollback to Revision 2
|
|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 3:32 | history | edited | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
you should've said no (Don't put words in my mouth, a reference suffices)
|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 2:21 | comment | added | Psycogeek | @Mehrdad I would not know another way to put it. you had a very specific question, you got a list of software, a debate, and it concluded with a messy Q&A session. | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 1:44 | comment | added | user541686 | @Psycogeek: Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "inspired another List (including me)", "it has another list in it", etc... could you rephrase your question please? | |
| Feb 15, 2012 at 1:24 | comment | added | Psycogeek | @mehrdad Can you admit that the question went to heck, when your question inspired another List (including me). And when you attempted to defend the reasoning behind the specifics in your question? Can you admit that it has another list in it, including items you specificly excluded? Can you admit that the question Became messy, and one that doesnt fit into the little perfect plan of the site? Was it non-constuctive, or did it BECOME non-constructive? | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 19:56 | answer | added | randomMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 18:55 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | @sidran32 Where's the runs well on ancient hardware filter on that site? With this requirement, it becomes a question requiring specific expert expertise. | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 18:51 | comment | added | Ben Richards | I'd say because we already have sites like: alternativeto.net | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 18:41 | answer | added | Daniel BeckMod | timeline score: 17 | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 18:33 | history | edited | user541686 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 126 characters in body
|
| Feb 14, 2012 at 18:27 | history | asked | user541686 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |