Skip to main content
added 198 characters in body
Source Link
slhck
  • 232.5k
  • 4
  • 79
  • 150

Another update – went through the tag three times now. We're down to 50 questions left. If you still see anything that'd be left tagged poorly, please don't hesitate to fix it.


Update after 4/0 on JourneymanGeek's answer: I went through the tagged questions and fixed missing tags / retagged. If the tag should be nuked, go for it.


(x95) seems very ambiguous. I guess we can split them up into more precise tags like:

What do you think – should we just nuke this tag and let the questions stay as they are, or should we go through them and re-tag appropriately?

Please post your idea below, we can then agree on a procedure to re-tag appropriately.


Update after 4/0 on JourneymanGeek's answer: I went through the tagged questions and fixed missing tags / retagged. If the tag should be nuked, go for it.

(x95) seems very ambiguous. I guess we can split them up into more precise tags like:

What do you think – should we just nuke this tag and let the questions stay as they are, or should we go through them and re-tag appropriately?

Please post your idea below, we can then agree on a procedure to re-tag appropriately.


Update after 4/0 on JourneymanGeek's answer: I went through the tagged questions and fixed missing tags / retagged. If the tag should be nuked, go for it.

Another update – went through the tag three times now. We're down to 50 questions left. If you still see anything that'd be left tagged poorly, please don't hesitate to fix it.


Update after 4/0 on JourneymanGeek's answer: I went through the tagged questions and fixed missing tags / retagged. If the tag should be nuked, go for it.


(x95) seems very ambiguous. I guess we can split them up into more precise tags like:

What do you think – should we just nuke this tag and let the questions stay as they are, or should we go through them and re-tag appropriately?

Please post your idea below, we can then agree on a procedure to re-tag appropriately.

edited tags
Link
Sathyajith Bhat Mod
  • 62.1k
  • 3
  • 54
  • 93
added 178 characters in body
Source Link
slhck
  • 232.5k
  • 4
  • 79
  • 150

Disambiguating or burninating the tag [movies] tag

(x95) seems very ambiguous. I guess we can split them up into more precise tags like:

What do you think – should we just nuke this tag and let the questions stay as they are, or should we go through them and re-tag appropriately?

Please post your idea below, we can then agree on a procedure to re-tag appropriately.


Update after 4/0 on JourneymanGeek's answer: I went through the tagged questions and fixed missing tags / retagged. If the tag should be nuked, go for it.

Disambiguating the tag [movies]

(x95) seems very ambiguous. I guess we can split them up into more precise tags like:

What do you think – should we just nuke this tag and let the questions stay as they are, or should we go through them and re-tag appropriately?

Please post your idea below, we can then agree on a procedure to re-tag appropriately.

Disambiguating or burninating the [movies] tag

(x95) seems very ambiguous. I guess we can split them up into more precise tags like:

What do you think – should we just nuke this tag and let the questions stay as they are, or should we go through them and re-tag appropriately?

Please post your idea below, we can then agree on a procedure to re-tag appropriately.


Update after 4/0 on JourneymanGeek's answer: I went through the tagged questions and fixed missing tags / retagged. If the tag should be nuked, go for it.

Source Link
slhck
  • 232.5k
  • 4
  • 79
  • 150
Loading