Timeline for Do we need both [website] and [webpage]?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2012 at 22:52 | comment | added | iglvzx |
I think [webpage] is a valid tag, especially if you are talking about "save as webpage" or working with a web file (e.g. HTML). I think [website] is too vague and something like [browsing] or [server] would be better.
|
|
| Mar 16, 2012 at 15:08 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @slhck: If only meta.stackexchange.com/questions/125234/… existed. :( | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 15:06 | comment | added | slhck | Yeah, but then website → hosting wouldn't exist too. | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 15:05 | comment | added | Tamara Wijsman | @slhck: If you set up a synonym from website to a more general tag like browsing (just an example, perhaps better tags exist?) it would show up to them. #1 could be a solution as the separation isn't really that important, but is it on the other hand important to have one tag instead of two... | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 15:01 | comment | added | slhck | I don't see the usefulness in having them separated if the meaning is not clear. Therefore, 1 seems reasonable. I like 3, but people won't use "browsing" when they ask a question about a random "website" (i.e. that probably won't occur to them when tagging). | |
| Mar 16, 2012 at 13:48 | history | answered | Tamara Wijsman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |