Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I searched for how to handle excpetions in rspec and got to this questionthis question.

It did not help as the syntax is outdated. So I figured it out myself and added a new answer. But I can hardly imagine that it will top the current answer. So basically every user has to go through trial and error until he reaches my solution.

In this special case I would need 76 votes until the right solution gets to the top.

This might also be an issue in games that release patches very fast, like Starcraft 2. This build order is outdated and cannot be used anymore due to several constains patched several months ago. As you cannot play Starcraft 2 with old patches this information is useless. Someone new to the game might try this and get confused.

How should we handle such cases?

I searched for how to handle excpetions in rspec and got to this question.

It did not help as the syntax is outdated. So I figured it out myself and added a new answer. But I can hardly imagine that it will top the current answer. So basically every user has to go through trial and error until he reaches my solution.

In this special case I would need 76 votes until the right solution gets to the top.

This might also be an issue in games that release patches very fast, like Starcraft 2. This build order is outdated and cannot be used anymore due to several constains patched several months ago. As you cannot play Starcraft 2 with old patches this information is useless. Someone new to the game might try this and get confused.

How should we handle such cases?

I searched for how to handle excpetions in rspec and got to this question.

It did not help as the syntax is outdated. So I figured it out myself and added a new answer. But I can hardly imagine that it will top the current answer. So basically every user has to go through trial and error until he reaches my solution.

In this special case I would need 76 votes until the right solution gets to the top.

This might also be an issue in games that release patches very fast, like Starcraft 2. This build order is outdated and cannot be used anymore due to several constains patched several months ago. As you cannot play Starcraft 2 with old patches this information is useless. Someone new to the game might try this and get confused.

How should we handle such cases?

replaced http://gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I searched for how to handle excpetions in rspec and got to this question.

It did not help as the syntax is outdated. So I figured it out myself and added a new answer. But I can hardly imagine that it will top the current answer. So basically every user has to go through trial and error until he reaches my solution.

In this special case I would need 76 votes until the right solution gets to the top.

This might also be an issue in games that release patches very fast, like Starcraft 2. This build orderThis build order is outdated and cannot be used anymore due to several constains patched several months ago. As you cannot play Starcraft 2 with old patches this information is useless. Someone new to the game might try this and get confused.

How should we handle such cases?

I searched for how to handle excpetions in rspec and got to this question.

It did not help as the syntax is outdated. So I figured it out myself and added a new answer. But I can hardly imagine that it will top the current answer. So basically every user has to go through trial and error until he reaches my solution.

In this special case I would need 76 votes until the right solution gets to the top.

This might also be an issue in games that release patches very fast, like Starcraft 2. This build order is outdated and cannot be used anymore due to several constains patched several months ago. As you cannot play Starcraft 2 with old patches this information is useless. Someone new to the game might try this and get confused.

How should we handle such cases?

I searched for how to handle excpetions in rspec and got to this question.

It did not help as the syntax is outdated. So I figured it out myself and added a new answer. But I can hardly imagine that it will top the current answer. So basically every user has to go through trial and error until he reaches my solution.

In this special case I would need 76 votes until the right solution gets to the top.

This might also be an issue in games that release patches very fast, like Starcraft 2. This build order is outdated and cannot be used anymore due to several constains patched several months ago. As you cannot play Starcraft 2 with old patches this information is useless. Someone new to the game might try this and get confused.

How should we handle such cases?

Post Migrated Away to meta.stackexchange.com by Tamara Wijsman, slhck, nhinkle
Post Locked by CommunityBot
Post Closed as "off topic" by Tamara Wijsman, slhck, nhinkle
Source Link
ayckoster
  • 519
  • 2
  • 3

How to handle outdated answers?

I searched for how to handle excpetions in rspec and got to this question.

It did not help as the syntax is outdated. So I figured it out myself and added a new answer. But I can hardly imagine that it will top the current answer. So basically every user has to go through trial and error until he reaches my solution.

In this special case I would need 76 votes until the right solution gets to the top.

This might also be an issue in games that release patches very fast, like Starcraft 2. This build order is outdated and cannot be used anymore due to several constains patched several months ago. As you cannot play Starcraft 2 with old patches this information is useless. Someone new to the game might try this and get confused.

How should we handle such cases?