Timeline for Should I accept a "thank you" edit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Jun 13, 2012 at 4:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSuper_User/status/212764767578886145 | ||
| Jun 11, 2012 at 4:47 | history | edited | user541686 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jun 9, 2012 at 3:13 | answer | added | bwDraco | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 1, 2012 at 18:04 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | @devius The edit would be attributed to the unregistered user. It looks like she trashed her browser cookies, or changed the browser. | |
| Jun 1, 2012 at 13:07 | comment | added | devius | Do note that in some cases even users with 1 rep can add comments as explained in the FAQ. It's a tiny footnote at the end of the privileges table, but it's there. So I think there's no escuse for a "thank you" edit. | |
| Jun 1, 2012 at 8:24 | vote | accept | Bram | ||
| Jun 1, 2012 at 8:23 | answer | added | Sathyajith BhatMod | timeline score: 26 | |
| Jun 1, 2012 at 7:54 | history | asked | Bram | CC BY-SA 3.0 |