Timeline for Suggestions for updating our FAQ
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2012 at 16:10 | comment | added | slhck | might get a better response just seems.. meh. Maybe keep it as neutral as possible and say There are certain subjects that are also on-topic on our sister sites? | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 20:00 | comment | added | nhinkle Mod | Hmm. I agree that the implication is a bit too heavy towards the "don't ask these here" side even though that's not what we're trying to convey. Let's see if we can't come up with something to convey that a bit more accurately. | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 18:59 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | @IvoFlipse Not a specific wording, but I'd suggest linking to this meta topic for both off topic questions (See here for sites where you can ask questions about these topics.) and alternative site suggestions (See here for sites about similar topics.) instead of listing sites right there in the FAQ. We'd need to change its scope a bit though. The other benefit would be the ability of the community to react to changes in SE site lineup. AFAIK changing a trilogy FAQ is pretty difficult. | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 18:45 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse Mod | I tried to keep the wording neutral, just to make it clear that there are other sites, not to claim they have more expertise than us. The vast majority of the users do not read the FAQ, so it won't affect them. But if you disagree strongly, what wording would you propose? | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 18:07 | history | answered | Daniel BeckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |