Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

Edits on Super User are very important, it gives sense to many questions and answers here and I think it deserves a good stimulus (such as "Editor""Editor" and "Copy Editor""Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also deserves a counterpart. I mean, if you made a bad edit, you should be "penalized" and receive feedback from moderators and the community to help you improve your edits.

Most edits are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, similar to how questions/answers can receive up or down votes, lets users vote on edits.

I'm not speaking about giving reputation to edits, but there could be, for example, another Gold/Silver/Bronze badge for +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on edits. Each edit "upvote" would sum up to have users reach the badge – and each edit "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, feel free to edit/improve anything here.

PS: I already made a lot of "bad" edits but nowadays I have acquired experience to improve my edits just like I got experience in writing better answers and questions than maybe one year ago – this all was stimulated by the reputation system. What I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to encourage good edits and, in consequence, better answers and questions on Super User.

Edits on Super User are very important, it gives sense to many questions and answers here and I think it deserves a good stimulus (such as "Editor" and "Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also deserves a counterpart. I mean, if you made a bad edit, you should be "penalized" and receive feedback from moderators and the community to help you improve your edits.

Most edits are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, similar to how questions/answers can receive up or down votes, lets users vote on edits.

I'm not speaking about giving reputation to edits, but there could be, for example, another Gold/Silver/Bronze badge for +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on edits. Each edit "upvote" would sum up to have users reach the badge – and each edit "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, feel free to edit/improve anything here.

PS: I already made a lot of "bad" edits but nowadays I have acquired experience to improve my edits just like I got experience in writing better answers and questions than maybe one year ago – this all was stimulated by the reputation system. What I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to encourage good edits and, in consequence, better answers and questions on Super User.

Edits on Super User are very important, it gives sense to many questions and answers here and I think it deserves a good stimulus (such as "Editor" and "Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also deserves a counterpart. I mean, if you made a bad edit, you should be "penalized" and receive feedback from moderators and the community to help you improve your edits.

Most edits are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, similar to how questions/answers can receive up or down votes, lets users vote on edits.

I'm not speaking about giving reputation to edits, but there could be, for example, another Gold/Silver/Bronze badge for +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on edits. Each edit "upvote" would sum up to have users reach the badge – and each edit "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, feel free to edit/improve anything here.

PS: I already made a lot of "bad" edits but nowadays I have acquired experience to improve my edits just like I got experience in writing better answers and questions than maybe one year ago – this all was stimulated by the reputation system. What I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to encourage good edits and, in consequence, better answers and questions on Super User.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSuper_User/status/220420249093292032
editions => edits; edited title
Source Link
slhck
  • 232.5k
  • 4
  • 79
  • 150

Suggestion for a system to qualifyvote on edits

Edits on Super User are very important, it gives sense to much of many questions and answers here and I think it deserves a good stimulus  (such as "Editor" and "Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also deserves a counterpart,. I mean, if you made a bad edit, you should be "penalized" and receive a feedback from moderators and the community to help you improve your edits.

Most of edits are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, such assimilar to how questions/answers receivescan receive up or down reputation votes, editions could have another similar system..lets users vote on edits. 

I'm not sayingspeaking about givesgiving reputation to editions exactlyedits, but there wouldcould be, for example, another Gold/Silver/CopperBronze badge for example +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on editionedits. Each editionedit "upvote" would sumssum up to have users reach the badgesbadge – and each editionedit "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, fellfeel free to edit/improve anything here...

PS: I already made a lot of "bad" edits but nowadays I have acquired experience to improve my edits just as the same waylike I acquiredgot experience to makein writing better answers and questions that fromthan maybe one year ago(stimulated from – this all was stimulated by the reputation system), what. What I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to stimulate to encourage good editionsedits and consequently, in consequence, better answers and questions generally on Super User...

Suggestion for a system to qualify edits

Edits on Super User are very important, it gives sense to much of questions and answers here and I think it deserves a good stimulus(such as "Editor" and "Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also deserves a counterpart, I mean, if you made a bad edit, you should be "penalized" and receive a feedback from moderators and community to help you improve your edits.

Most of edits are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, such as questions/answers receives up or down reputation votes, editions could have another similar system... I'm not saying about gives reputation to editions exactly, but there would be for example another Gold/Silver/Copper badge for example +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on edition. Each edition "upvote" would sums to reach the badges and each edition "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, fell free to edit/improve anything here...

PS: I already made a lot of "bad" edits but nowadays I have acquired experience to improve edits just as the same way I acquired experience to make better answers and questions that from one year ago(stimulated from reputation system), what I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to stimulate to good editions and consequently better answers and questions generally on Super User...

Suggestion for a system to vote on edits

Edits on Super User are very important, it gives sense to many questions and answers here and I think it deserves a good stimulus  (such as "Editor" and "Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also deserves a counterpart. I mean, if you made a bad edit, you should be "penalized" and receive feedback from moderators and the community to help you improve your edits.

Most edits are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, similar to how questions/answers can receive up or down votes, lets users vote on edits. 

I'm not speaking about giving reputation to edits, but there could be, for example, another Gold/Silver/Bronze badge for +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on edits. Each edit "upvote" would sum up to have users reach the badge – and each edit "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, feel free to edit/improve anything here.

PS: I already made a lot of "bad" edits but nowadays I have acquired experience to improve my edits just like I got experience in writing better answers and questions than maybe one year ago – this all was stimulated by the reputation system. What I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to encourage good edits and, in consequence, better answers and questions on Super User.

deleted 15 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Sathyajith Bhat Mod
  • 62.1k
  • 3
  • 54
  • 93

Suggestion for a system to qualify editionsedits

EditionsEdits on SUSuper User are very important, it gives sense to much of questions and answers here and I think it desearvesdeserves a good stimulus(such as "Editor" and "Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also desearvesdeserves a counterpart, I mean, if you made a bad editionedit, you should be "penalized" and receive a feed-backfeedback from moderatosmoderators and comunitycommunity to help you improve your editionsedits.

MuchMost of editionsedits are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, such as questions/answers receives up or down reputation votes, editions could have another similar system... I'm not saying about gives reputation to editions exactly, but there would be for example another goldGold/silverSilver/cooperCopper badge for example +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on edition. Each edition "upvote" would sums to reach the badges and each edition "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, fell free to edit/improve anything here...

PS: I already makemade a lot of "bad" editionsedits but nowadays I alreadyhave acquired experience to improve editionsedits just as the same way I acquired experience to make better answers and questions that from one year ago(stimulated from reputation system), what I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to stimulate to good editions and consequently better answers and questions generally on SuperuserSuper User...

Suggestion for a system to qualify editions

Editions on SU are very important, it gives sense to much of questions and answers here and I think it desearves a good stimulus(such as "Editor" and "Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also desearves a counterpart, I mean, if you made a bad edition, you should be "penalized" and receive a feed-back from moderatos and comunity to help you improve your editions.

Much of editions are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, such as questions/answers receives up or down reputation votes, editions could have another similar system... I'm not saying about gives reputation to editions exactly, but there would be for example another gold/silver/cooper badge for example +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on edition. Each edition "upvote" would sums to reach the badges and each edition "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, fell free to edit/improve anything here...

PS: I already make a lot of "bad" editions but nowadays I already acquired experience to improve editions just as the same way I acquired experience to make better answers and questions that from one year ago(stimulated from reputation system), what I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to stimulate to good editions and consequently better answers and questions generally on Superuser...

Suggestion for a system to qualify edits

Edits on Super User are very important, it gives sense to much of questions and answers here and I think it deserves a good stimulus(such as "Editor" and "Copy Editor" badges), but in my humble opinion it also deserves a counterpart, I mean, if you made a bad edit, you should be "penalized" and receive a feedback from moderators and community to help you improve your edits.

Most of edits are good, most of them are useless and some just scratch question/answer sense. My suggestion is a system that, such as questions/answers receives up or down reputation votes, editions could have another similar system... I'm not saying about gives reputation to editions exactly, but there would be for example another Gold/Silver/Copper badge for example +500/+200/+15 "upvotes" on edition. Each edition "upvote" would sums to reach the badges and each edition "downvote" would decrease this sum.

This is just an idea that I would like to discuss and to make people think about, fell free to edit/improve anything here...

PS: I already made a lot of "bad" edits but nowadays I have acquired experience to improve edits just as the same way I acquired experience to make better answers and questions that from one year ago(stimulated from reputation system), what I'm thinking here is to provide to new users a way to stimulate to good editions and consequently better answers and questions generally on Super User...

Source Link
Diogo
  • 30.7k
  • 13
  • 11
Loading