Timeline for How exactly are we supposed to treat duplicates of questions that have no upvoted/accepted answers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Apr 18, 2013 at 14:10 | comment | added | Karan | @KronoS: That might work in this case as slhck commented below, but of course the general case is when we have dupes with no upvotes/accepted answers, and thus can't vote in either direction. Guess we just end up with multiple unanswered questions and leave it at that. (The clean freak in me would of course really prefer a workable solution for merging such questions to reduce clutter on the site, but seems discussions regarding this haven't gotten anywhere so far.) | |
| Apr 18, 2013 at 14:08 | answer | added | James Mertz | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 18, 2013 at 14:01 | vote | accept | Karan | ||
| Apr 18, 2013 at 13:54 | comment | added | slhck Mod | For the record, we're talking about this question being flagged as a duplicate of this one. | |
| Apr 18, 2013 at 13:53 | history | edited | slhckMod |
let's not rant, shall we
|
|
| Apr 18, 2013 at 13:44 | answer | added | slhckMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 18, 2013 at 13:09 | history | asked | Karan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |