Timeline for What is "not an answer" supposed to mean?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2014 at 20:29 | comment | added | gparyani | It is possible to deem flags as helpful with messages now, and moderators can now dismiss flags individually. | |
| Jul 20, 2013 at 17:27 | comment | added | Karan | Thanks slhck, we all try to do our bit to help you guys out. Also that's good news @DanielBeck. I fully support this and upvoted the request. Hopefully it's implemented soon. | |
| Jul 20, 2013 at 16:02 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | It's even status-planned. (CC @Karan) | |
| Jul 19, 2013 at 20:05 | comment | added | slhck Mod | There is a lot of restructuring going on with the way flags work in the backend, since it's one of the oldest features that has accumulated some cruft over the years. I believe with the changes we'll soon have the ability to dismiss flags individually, which would have prevented this from happening. I'm sure you didn't take this the wrong way. You have a great flagging record and do a lot of moderating, so I hope you continue with your work – it's much appreciated. | |
| Jul 19, 2013 at 18:01 | vote | accept | Karan | ||
| Jul 19, 2013 at 18:00 | comment | added | Karan | Yes, I indicated clearly above that it doesn't matter (which you might not believe since I posted this question). It wasn't a complaint and I didn't want to point fingers at or draw attention to the mod in question, so please don't feel the need to apologise. Your response has made it clear there are moderator restrictions on multiple flag handling which I was completely unaware of, so that explains perfectly the flag message. Not ideal, but understandable. (I see no technical reason for the restriction BTW other than that this isn't a feature considered worth implementing by the SE devs.) | |
| Jul 19, 2013 at 17:49 | history | answered | slhckMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |