Timeline for Close votes on a question that isn't off topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Feb 10, 2014 at 21:15 | vote | accept | DanteTheEgregore | ||
| Nov 27, 2013 at 8:43 | answer | added | David Schwartz | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 22, 2013 at 13:02 | answer | added | ChrisF | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 10:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/super_user/status/402749323030827008 | ||
| Nov 18, 2013 at 19:02 | comment | added | DanteTheEgregore | @OliverSalzburg Actually, the question I linked is similar, but unrelated as it addresses a different group of ads in Skype that can easily be disabled from the settings. | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 18:59 | comment | added | Oliver Salzburg Mod | An identical question not having your desired answer does not merit posting a duplicate of that question. | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 18:43 | comment | added | A. Donda | It appears to me that flagging is especially hasty on superuser, and flaggers almost never care to explain their actions. | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 16:58 | comment | added | DanteTheEgregore | @AlEverett Yes, well, I assumed that. Still fails to explain why my question was so hastily flagged down by five users. | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 16:54 | comment | added | ale | Skype is not a web-app, so it would be inappropriate to migrate to Web Applications. | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 14:35 | history | edited | DanteTheEgregore | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 18, 2013 at 14:18 | comment | added | Daniel Beck Mod | Reopened. And I wasn't the only one, three others voted before me. | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 13:46 | comment | added | That Brazilian Guy | Clearly, the Powers That Be don't like you. Change username and avatar. | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 13:37 | history | edited | DanteTheEgregore | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 335 characters in body
|
| Nov 18, 2013 at 13:29 | comment | added | DanteTheEgregore | And now it's on hold with little to no explanation why. Can someone please explain this to me? | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 13:22 | history | asked | DanteTheEgregore | CC BY-SA 3.0 |