Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

You're right; the post appears to be addressing the comment from Xero, but it's only evident looking at the first revisionfirst revision which was the version you had flagged, but not the one visible to the moderator handling the flag.

On first sight it really looks like it's a separate answer that could use some user's help to be improved (not necessarily a mod though, hence the declined flag).

But anyway, the formatting is horrible. It is plagiarized, the OP admitted they didn't really care about it, and it's unlikely to be salvaged. So I deleted it after all.

You're right; the post appears to be addressing the comment from Xero, but it's only evident looking at the first revision which was the version you had flagged, but not the one visible to the moderator handling the flag.

On first sight it really looks like it's a separate answer that could use some user's help to be improved (not necessarily a mod though, hence the declined flag).

But anyway, the formatting is horrible. It is plagiarized, the OP admitted they didn't really care about it, and it's unlikely to be salvaged. So I deleted it after all.

You're right; the post appears to be addressing the comment from Xero, but it's only evident looking at the first revision which was the version you had flagged, but not the one visible to the moderator handling the flag.

On first sight it really looks like it's a separate answer that could use some user's help to be improved (not necessarily a mod though, hence the declined flag).

But anyway, the formatting is horrible. It is plagiarized, the OP admitted they didn't really care about it, and it's unlikely to be salvaged. So I deleted it after all.

added 58 characters in body
Source Link
slhck Mod
  • 232.5k
  • 4
  • 79
  • 150

You're right; the post appears to be addressing the comment from Xero, but it's only evident looking at the first revision which wasn'twas the latest whenversion you had flagged it (and subsequently, but not directlythe one visible to the moderator handling the flag).

On first sight it really looks like it's a separate answer that could use some user's help to be improved (not necessarily a mod though, hence the declined flag).

But anyway, the formatting is horrible. It is plagiarized, the OP admitted they didn't really care about it, and it's unlikely to be salvaged. So I deleted it after all.

You're right; the post appears to be addressing the comment from Xero, but it's only evident looking at the first revision which wasn't the latest when you had flagged it (and subsequently not directly visible to the moderator handling the flag).

On first sight it really looks like it's a separate answer that could use some user's help to be improved (not necessarily a mod though, hence the declined flag).

But anyway, the formatting is horrible. It is plagiarized, the OP admitted they didn't really care about it, and it's unlikely to be salvaged. So I deleted it after all.

You're right; the post appears to be addressing the comment from Xero, but it's only evident looking at the first revision which was the version you had flagged, but not the one visible to the moderator handling the flag.

On first sight it really looks like it's a separate answer that could use some user's help to be improved (not necessarily a mod though, hence the declined flag).

But anyway, the formatting is horrible. It is plagiarized, the OP admitted they didn't really care about it, and it's unlikely to be salvaged. So I deleted it after all.

Source Link
slhck Mod
  • 232.5k
  • 4
  • 79
  • 150

You're right; the post appears to be addressing the comment from Xero, but it's only evident looking at the first revision which wasn't the latest when you had flagged it (and subsequently not directly visible to the moderator handling the flag).

On first sight it really looks like it's a separate answer that could use some user's help to be improved (not necessarily a mod though, hence the declined flag).

But anyway, the formatting is horrible. It is plagiarized, the OP admitted they didn't really care about it, and it's unlikely to be salvaged. So I deleted it after all.