Skip to main content

Timeline for User spamming - intentional or not?

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Jul 22, 2010 at 18:01 history migrated from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Mar 11, 2010 at 23:14 answer added Zypher timeline score: 3
Mar 11, 2010 at 20:18 comment added Josh K Wouldn't either be frowned upon?
Mar 11, 2010 at 19:08 comment added rlb.usa Do you really mean 'spam' or do you mean 'rep whoring' ?
Mar 11, 2010 at 18:48 answer added ベレアー アダム timeline score: 3
Mar 11, 2010 at 1:46 comment added random Today's link spammer knows that to make it look less like spamming certain sites, you have to throw in some in the clear to mix it up. @kop
Mar 11, 2010 at 1:35 comment added Kop @random: by ALL of them? I don't know if you took a look but there are really many different websites, some of them very known and reputable.
Mar 11, 2010 at 1:25 comment added random If he doesn't own them, he could be paid to link to them.
Mar 11, 2010 at 0:22 answer added Andreas Bonini timeline score: 5
Mar 11, 2010 at 0:14 comment added sth If you want us to give an informed opinion you'll have to give us a link to the maybe problematic questions.
Mar 10, 2010 at 23:50 answer added Ether timeline score: 3
Mar 10, 2010 at 23:49 answer added Pekka timeline score: 1
Mar 10, 2010 at 23:42 comment added Juan Manuel (ie: point us to an example)
Mar 10, 2010 at 23:42 comment added Jonathan Sampson Can you give us an example?
Mar 10, 2010 at 23:42 comment added Juan Manuel Link or it didn't happen
Mar 10, 2010 at 23:40 comment added o.k.w Perhaps he should be flagged, and let the mod decide.
Mar 10, 2010 at 23:36 history asked Josh K CC BY-SA 2.5