Timeline for Penalty for unexplained down-votes [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2014 at 15:16 | comment | added | Peter Mortensen | A cross-site duplicate is Encouraging people to explain downvotes. | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 1:35 | comment | added | AFH | @random - Fine. Will do. | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 1:30 | comment | added | random Mod | Eh, just leave it since other users may not use the same words in the other post | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 1:25 | comment | added | AFH | @Random - I did look quite hard for previous instances this question before I posted it, but none of my searches found your link. I agree that it is the same question. Since it has already been considered and answered, I am content to withdraw it. | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 1:14 | comment | added | AFH | @Ramhound - If a comment explaining a down-vote is retracted, that implies to me that there can be no reason for the down-vote, so of course it should be reversed. If a comment remains valid after further discussion or edits, then the down-vote stands. To down-vote without a reason seems entirely contrary to the intention and spirit of the site. | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 1:09 | history | closed | randomMod | Duplicate of Downvoting a question should require a comment/upvote of a comment | |
| Oct 25, 2014 at 0:57 | history | edited | randomMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 24, 2014 at 23:43 | comment | added | AFH | @JourneymanGeek - Yes, it is related, and I read it before my post, but it seems to address all down-votes, not uncommented ones. | |
| Oct 24, 2014 at 23:34 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | meta.stackexchange.com/questions/90324/… is related. | |
| Oct 24, 2014 at 23:11 | history | asked | AFH | CC BY-SA 3.0 |