Skip to main content
Super User

Return to Question

replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

Someone posted this question on Damn Small Linux and tagged it [dsl]. Once I figured out why, I checked the other [dsl] questions and found another.

Since there were only two, I retagged manually. There doesn't seem to be a distribution-specific tag for Damn Small Linux, so I had to create one (or remove the tag). My gut inclination was to tag them with [damn-small-linux], which is correct, but ... well, impolite. I ended up creating the tag [dsl-linux] instead.

Considering the existing [language-that-shall-not-be-named][language-that-shall-not-be-named] tag on SO, should we throw propriety to the wind, and go ahead and use the full [damn-small-linux]?

Someone posted this question on Damn Small Linux and tagged it [dsl]. Once I figured out why, I checked the other [dsl] questions and found another.

Since there were only two, I retagged manually. There doesn't seem to be a distribution-specific tag for Damn Small Linux, so I had to create one (or remove the tag). My gut inclination was to tag them with [damn-small-linux], which is correct, but ... well, impolite. I ended up creating the tag [dsl-linux] instead.

Considering the existing [language-that-shall-not-be-named] tag on SO, should we throw propriety to the wind, and go ahead and use the full [damn-small-linux]?

Someone posted this question on Damn Small Linux and tagged it [dsl]. Once I figured out why, I checked the other [dsl] questions and found another.

Since there were only two, I retagged manually. There doesn't seem to be a distribution-specific tag for Damn Small Linux, so I had to create one (or remove the tag). My gut inclination was to tag them with [damn-small-linux], which is correct, but ... well, impolite. I ended up creating the tag [dsl-linux] instead.

Considering the existing [language-that-shall-not-be-named] tag on SO, should we throw propriety to the wind, and go ahead and use the full [damn-small-linux]?

replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

Someone posted this questionthis question on Damn Small Linux and tagged it [dsl]. Once I figured out why, I checked the other [dsl] questionsother [dsl] questions and found anotheranother.

Since there were only two, I retagged manually. There doesn't seem to be a distribution-specific tag for Damn Small Linux, so I had to create one (or remove the tag). My gut inclination was to tag them with [damn-small-linux], which is correct, but ... well, impolite. I ended up creating the tag [dsl-linux][dsl-linux] instead.

Considering the existing [language-that-shall-not-be-named] tag on SO, should we throw propriety to the wind, and go ahead and use the full [damn-small-linux]?

Someone posted this question on Damn Small Linux and tagged it [dsl]. Once I figured out why, I checked the other [dsl] questions and found another.

Since there were only two, I retagged manually. There doesn't seem to be a distribution-specific tag for Damn Small Linux, so I had to create one (or remove the tag). My gut inclination was to tag them with [damn-small-linux], which is correct, but ... well, impolite. I ended up creating the tag [dsl-linux] instead.

Considering the existing [language-that-shall-not-be-named] tag on SO, should we throw propriety to the wind, and go ahead and use the full [damn-small-linux]?

Someone posted this question on Damn Small Linux and tagged it [dsl]. Once I figured out why, I checked the other [dsl] questions and found another.

Since there were only two, I retagged manually. There doesn't seem to be a distribution-specific tag for Damn Small Linux, so I had to create one (or remove the tag). My gut inclination was to tag them with [damn-small-linux], which is correct, but ... well, impolite. I ended up creating the tag [dsl-linux] instead.

Considering the existing [language-that-shall-not-be-named] tag on SO, should we throw propriety to the wind, and go ahead and use the full [damn-small-linux]?

Post Migrated Here from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Source Link
quack quixote
quack quixote

SU tags: recommend better tag for DSL (the linux distribution)

Someone posted this question on Damn Small Linux and tagged it [dsl]. Once I figured out why, I checked the other [dsl] questions and found another.

Since there were only two, I retagged manually. There doesn't seem to be a distribution-specific tag for Damn Small Linux, so I had to create one (or remove the tag). My gut inclination was to tag them with [damn-small-linux], which is correct, but ... well, impolite. I ended up creating the tag [dsl-linux] instead.

Considering the existing [language-that-shall-not-be-named] tag on SO, should we throw propriety to the wind, and go ahead and use the full [damn-small-linux]?