Timeline for Reviewing edits that substantively modify an answer
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2014 at 21:29 | comment | added | Psycogeek | My answer is not a default position , nor an answer, just discussion. must make that clear. For the minor error part, do we assume your not talking about spelling and grammer , but some misstatement or technically wrong information is corrected to say it technically correct? some minor parts of the whole are corrected to put the right numbers in? Correction of a person codes or scripting? Grey :-) yea, tough calls many times, but when it is really grey not B&W where would the benefit of the doubt go? Into the comment to be analised by the answeree and the people? or right into the answer? | |
| Dec 16, 2014 at 12:28 | history | edited | Psycogeek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 129 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2014 at 11:49 | history | edited | Psycogeek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2014 at 11:30 | history | edited | Psycogeek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 526 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2014 at 10:52 | history | edited | Psycogeek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1014 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2014 at 10:46 | history | edited | Psycogeek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1014 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2014 at 10:33 | history | answered | Psycogeek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |