Timeline for Negative votes on newest questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 19, 2014 at 19:29 | comment | added | I say Reinstate Monica | I think the problem is people (aka users in some circles). I got a red shirt by reviewing posts from some of these people, and I'm happy to hand out downvotes to those who deserve it, whether I get a hat (or shirt) or not. At the end of the day, incentives or not, users will still be users. | |
| Dec 18, 2014 at 23:03 | comment | added | Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007 | There's a few of them that seem stupid like that. Like "Go delete you own answer" or "delete X comments from 2014". | |
| Dec 18, 2014 at 20:16 | comment | added | fixer1234 | This was a really stupid and destructive thing to do as part of the hats definitions. The definitions need to be better reviewed in the future or SU should refrain from participation. | |
| Dec 18, 2014 at 5:08 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek Mod | I'd add they need to be put on hold or deleted. I'll prolly go through those, close the ones that deserve it, and upvotes the one that deserve it. Cause hats people :/ | |
| Dec 18, 2014 at 3:05 | comment | added | Tyson | Yea I hadn't noticed that hat. Encouraging down votes tho is a bad thing I think. Bad questions will get them without the encouragement xD | |
| Dec 18, 2014 at 3:02 | history | answered | bwDraco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |