Timeline for SU question closed as Exact Duplicate, but it does not seem to be the same to me.
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:02 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Mar 29, 2010 at 15:40 | comment | added | random | Was forgetting something... @qua | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 15:37 | comment | added | quack quixote | @ran yeah, i see that. don't you ever sleep?? | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 15:26 | comment | added | random | Already beat you to that daisy field. @qua | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 15:18 | comment | added | quack quixote | @random: i'd be tempted to close 21541 as offtopic and reopen 125222, tho, w.r.t. 21541, it's that gray-area of "web-based-but-locally-administered" as opposed to the clearly-offtopic "web-based-and-provided-by-someone-else". (although he's looking at Quark Server, which probably means it's really more of an SF question than SU.) back to 125222 (the question in question), i'd say just reopen, maybe point back to 21541 and indicate why it's not good enough. | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 15:06 | comment | added | random | Was actually thinking of swapping that other "Looking for software" as a dupe of yours since he wants web-based and that's not SU scope. If anyone wants to chime in, free for all. @vac | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 14:55 | comment | added | Vaccano | Alas, that post does not have an answer that does what I am looking for. :( Despite that, I agree that my question is much closer to a dupe of that one. (Maybe there is nothing out there that does what I am looking for.) Maybe I will write one.... | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 14:55 | comment | added | Juan Manuel | It must be so fun being a mod, I am having a blast with the 10k tools here on meta... | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 14:54 | comment | added | random | Yes, mods can have close and re-open wars with themselves. @dow | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 14:52 | comment | added | Juan Manuel | Can you re-open it and close it again? | |
| Mar 29, 2010 at 14:51 | history | answered | random | CC BY-SA 2.5 |