Timeline for New visitors can add images - should we review it
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:04 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.superuser.com/ with https://meta.superuser.com/
|
|
| Jun 6, 2015 at 6:54 | comment | added | Karan | "now that "new" (low rep) users can upload images" - Dave, according to the answer Sathya linked to the new user restrictions are still present on Stack Overflow, Server Fault, Ask Ubuntu and Super User. My question seemed to point to an anomaly that's still not been answered. | |
| Jun 5, 2015 at 20:51 | comment | added | Canadian Luke | Don't know, to be honest | |
| Jun 5, 2015 at 20:04 | comment | added | Dave | No just here @canadianluke but I am not about for a day or 2, can this be migrated? | |
| Jun 5, 2015 at 16:08 | comment | added | Canadian Luke | I'd support this, possibly network-wide. Have you tried asking on Meta.SE? | |
| Jun 5, 2015 at 14:38 | history | edited | Dave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 127 characters in body
|
| Jun 5, 2015 at 14:18 | history | edited | Dave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Jun 5, 2015 at 14:13 | history | asked | Dave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |