When this question was first written, it was missing some key details. Thus, one or two people voted it as opinion-based. This made sense, as without those key details, the question could certainly be interpreted as opinion-based.
The comments on the post made me aware of the missing information (special thanks to Journeyman Geek), so I added a whole bunch of key information.
Yet after I spent my time adding all this key information, it appears that moderator DavidPostill came around and voted to close the question as opinion-based, even though it was clearly not asking for an opinion. Unfortunately, Stack Exchange gives moderators too much power in this regard (I'm a moderator on another Stack Exchange site, so I'm certainly not mod-bashing), and this resulting in my post being immediately closed. If I'm misinterpreting what happened, please accept my apology, as I'm trying in good faith to be accurate with what transpired given the data presented to me by Stack Exchange.
Why was this question closed after the needed edits were made? This question is very simple: it asks how much free space Windows 11 needs to operate to perform its basic functions. If that's opinion-based, then all questions on Super User can be considered opinion-based.
Please note that in the question's comments, one helpful community member (thank you Frank Thomas!) has already provided a factual data point that helps pinpoint the answer to this question. It's a singular data point, so can't suffice as an answer, but is indicative that this is not an opinion-based question, but a question that can be answered with facts.