I propose merging (34 questions) with (79 questions). I think it's pretty clear to see why they should be merged.


... yeah, that pun was pretty terrible, even by retag request standards.




...... not sure what else to put here, so here's a Pandicorn.


  • Downvote for a useless panda, upvote for the bad pun... ;)
    – Burgi
    Jun 30, 2017 at 14:01
  • 2
    @Burgi Where do you see a panda? All I see is a pandicorn.
    – Stevoisiak
    Jun 30, 2017 at 14:04
  • Fair point well made.
    – Burgi
    Jun 30, 2017 at 14:21
  • I don’t see the point.  Oh, wait, that is the point.     :-)     ⁠ Jul 3, 2017 at 20:19
  • I'm tempted to just get on and make this change, but I can't see which should be merged into which. There's no clear "master" tag out of the two.
    – Mokubai Mod
    Jul 14, 2017 at 13:05
  • @Mokubai My vote is [transparency]. It has more questions tagged to it, and sounds a bit more general.
    – Stevoisiak
    Jul 14, 2017 at 13:05
  • @StevenVascellaro that was about the only justification for direction I could see as well. [Transparency] feels more about the process and result than just having something that is "transparent".
    – Mokubai Mod
    Jul 14, 2017 at 13:15

1 Answer 1


Merge done.

updating post history, 49 rows affected (pipe delimited) 
updating posts, 34 rows affected (pipe delimited) 
updating PostTags associations, 32 rows affected 
updating Documentation tag proposal commitments, 0 rows affected 
updating DocTags, 0 rows affected 
removing/renaming old tag, 0 rows affected 
updating count for master tag, new count: 111 
tag remapping of [transparency] and [transparent] complete! 
remapping 0 synonyms 
0 favorite and ignored tags remapped! 
0 tracked tag badges were remapped! 
Tag Synonym transparent -> transparency was approved!

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .