Recently I see through this question:
There is a late answer includes a link which it looks to be suspicious:
From what I read in other site meta guidelines, using a link to "promote" any product/service without disclosing author's affiliation like that post should be handled as "spam", but the flag declined with this reason:
It's not spam, and that profanity is part of the extension name.
I think this is not related to expletive word as part of extension name given in the post body, I'm more concerned with the link added by the poster which is potentially promoting something outside allowed external resources (i.e. commercial/paid service). Here are what I asked for:
Should I raise another flag when found other posts with similar manner if this is not obviously a "spam", or just do an edit by removing the offending link?
If a flag must be raised for this situation, what is the most proper option I need to choose on flagging dialog?
NB: The corresponding answer had already deleted when I write this post.