This question What display size and resolution is good for reading PDF in double page view? is closed as primarily opinion-based. I attempt to edit it like this, but it says I'm editing too much. What do you think?

Also, I suggest we add some more tag: readability, x-height, screen-size.


The recommended distance between your eyes and screen is an arm length.

The arm length is around 60 cm (25 inch). At that distance, the x-height for easy readability is 3 mm (2 "sub-inch").

What display sizes and resolutions are the best suitable to read PDF books in double page view? Is 24" in 1900 x 1200 enough for that?

I currently have a 17" in SXGA.

  • It would be better if you asked your own question, within scope, that answered your question. It's very unlikely the author will ever improve the question so it can be answered. – Ramhound Oct 9 at 1:24
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Eh, mayb, but you can't save them all. I've totally posted an answer to a question that could be POB with... a lot of detail and graphs and even a link to a spreadhseet

On the other hand, as someone who has a system designed to help with personal learning disabilities, this really feels massively opinion based. I like high pixel densities (UHD FTW) with very large fonts in this situation.

All 3 of your tags feel meta-taggy as well.

So, eh while you definately seem to have a personal stake here, I'm not sure that its possible to edit a 4 year old question, respecting the intent of the user without making a lot of guesses. Its possible to answer a question like that epically but in this case I guess the community felt otherwise.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .