Difficulty formulating question such that it does not elicit theoretical vs practical debate

Question

In this question, I am trying to ask for something that from user experience sounds very simple "I would like want an software that blocks something for me as administrator on a computer" (as xy-problem) where the software is already supplied (being switchhosts.exe) with a particular question on the implementation of the file removal prevention.

However, this seems to lead to the response an administrator can always do anything so what you ask is impossible. I am not able to clearly communicate that the user in the question is not equal to an actual administrator because the user in question has behavioral limitations, which result in a limitation of the practical power of the user, w.r.t. an actual administrator.

I expect this small gap in power w.r.t. an actual administrator can be used to encrypt a process such that the user can not stop the process nor delete it. And I assume the user can throw away the key to that encryption (once).

Question

What could I adapt to remove ambiguities from the question and/or reduce the amount of discussion (regarding administrator can always do anything)?

Doubt

It seems like it is a question about something that one should not want, because an administrator can always do anything so you're asking the impossible. Yet at the same time it can be quite practical real-life challenge that a user/admin might face in daily life.

Are there other perspectives on approaching this question from the fail-safe perspective (not improving yourself to fail less, but improving your system to mitigate failure consequences)?

Answer 1

I want software that blocks something for me as administrator on a computer

Regardless of how you phrase it, asking for software is, by definition, off topic on Super User.

We even have a specific close reason for such questions:

Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question.

^{(emphasis mine)}

There is also another site, Software Recommentations, where such questions are potentially on topic.

If you are going to ask there but please first read What is required for a question to contain "enough information".

What could I adapt to remove ambiguities from the question and/or reduce the amount of discussion (regarding administrator can always do anything)?

^{(emphasis mine)}

There can be no discussion as "administrator can always do anything" is a true statement, so there is nothing to discuss. Discussion cannot change a true statement into a false statement.

You are asking for the impossible. Administrators on any operating system can do anything by definition. That is the whole purpose of being an Administrator.

Alternatively referred to as an admin, administrator, and gatekeeper, root is a superuser account on a computer or network and has complete control. When referring to a Unix and Linux computer, this user is often known as root. On a Windows computer and on a network, this user is often referred to as an administrator. However, each of these terms is interchangeable.

^{(emphasis mine)}

Source What is an Administrator?

at the same time it can be quite practical real-life challenge that a user/admin might face in daily life.

This statement is also true. However these kinds of challenges (self control issues) are also off topic on Super User.