2

When flagging a question, the "spam" radio button has the following explanation:

Exists only to promote a product or service, does not disclose the author's affiliation.

There are posts like https://superuser.com/q/1668391/105002 that clearly don't promote anything, but they are suspected to be "spam seeds", i.e. spam is expected to appear in the comments or replies. If flagging such posts as spam is correct (which I guess it is, as the linked question has been flagged as such), shouldn't we update the explanation?

5
  • This is yet another example of SE ambiguity. What does the comma in the non-sentence description mean? Specifically, does the question have to meet both criteria, or only one? Aug 9 at 12:44
  • @RayButterworth: It's not related to my question, but true also :-)
    – choroba
    Aug 9 at 13:25
  • @Ray - The tag description is proper English other than missing "It's" at the beginning of the sentence.
    – Ramhound
    Aug 9 at 21:12
  • @Ramhound, it's still ambiguous as to whether the "," means "or" or "and". SE seems to like vague rules that are known only to those at the top. Arcane knowledge is part of the gamification of the site. Aug 9 at 22:21
  • @RayButterworth - I just thought I would point out, although it might be confusing to some, it actually is proper english.
    – Ramhound
    Aug 9 at 22:23
3

"Exists only to promote a product or service" is not equivalent to "promotes a product or service".

A spam seed does not promote by itself, it's a prelude to an answer that promotes. Still the ultimate purpose is to promote. The seed exists only to promote a product or service, ultimately.

If I believe some post is a spam seed then I believe it exists only to promote a product or service, even if it doesn't promote by itself. The description applies and I flag.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .