5

I read most posts for educational purposes. It would be very helpful if there was an unread sort function.

Regards,

5
  • 1
    You might want to propose this at Meta.SO instead, although I have the believe that there isn't much interest in this.
    – Tamara Wijsman
    Jan 20, 2011 at 20:40
  • 1
    @TomWij If required moderators can migrate question to Meta SO if there is enough support for a future, no need to repost it there.
    – BinaryMisfit
    Jan 20, 2011 at 21:00
  • @Diago: Well, I was thinking the question here could then be deleted. But from my point of view I can't just do a close vote or flag as I'm unsure about the use of migrating it there. But yeah, I might have asked if he wants migration instead, thanks. :-)
    – Tamara Wijsman
    Jan 20, 2011 at 21:15
  • What do you mean by "undread"? Meaning you haven't read it or nobody's read it?
    – nhinkle
    Jan 21, 2011 at 1:52
  • 1
    I mean unread by me. Thanks
    – Xavierjazz
    Jan 21, 2011 at 17:42

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

Can't you just sort the questions by newest first and then read them starting from the oldest one?

You have to apply a "read now or bookmark for later" policy, this will allow you to just keep bookmarking.

That way, you don't have to track if you have read an individual question; instead, you just need to track what the last question vaù and process all newer questions. Those you haven't read are bookmarked. :-)

1
  • I do use "newest 1st". I'll accept this and we can all move on. Thanks everyone.
    – Xavierjazz
    Jan 21, 2011 at 17:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .