2

Possible Duplicate:
Do we care about edit flooding? Should we be doing anything?

I refreshed my SU page and it went PINK.

As I count, there are 15 questions on the main SU view with nK views. Is this just the luck of the draw or did some bot find us?

UPDATE: There are 16 now, and Tom Wijisman is the name showing last edit on each. Is this maybe just the freaky funny result of some maintenance?

marked as duplicate by Breakthrough, Tamara Wijsman, slhck, studiohack Aug 10 '11 at 23:01

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

8

The user - Tom - appears to have gone on an editing spree which has flooded the home page with old questions.

Ideally edits should be done one or two at a time to avoid this, but (and I haven't checked the edits) in some cases it might be better to do a whole load to get rid of potentially harmful link (for example) and take the hit of a skewed home page.

Once the edit spree is over the page will settle down to normal activity.

  • Do we know why its only high view questions? – n0pe Aug 10 '11 at 21:30
  • 1
    @MaxMackie - you'd have to ask Tom. He's not a mod or employee, just a relatively high rep user. – ChrisF Aug 10 '11 at 21:34
  • Seems to be a spree of editing Question titles... rephrasing them as, well, Questions. – Windos Aug 10 '11 at 21:42
  • 2
    @MaxMackie: I'm giving the top viewed questions better titles so that they represent actual proper questions rather than thrown together words, ranging from 413k to 32k views. As I want to limit the flood and getting bored I've stopped, a large part of the total views has been handled which make the titles stand out much better on Google and the site itself. I will look into scheduling future mass edits in a X questions / list way in the future with X a rather small number, or perhaps they should consider handing me a fork so I don't bump the front page... – Tamara Wijsman Aug 10 '11 at 21:43
  • 4
    Certainly made the entire homepage look like a chum machine with spam and the kind of titles you see on low quality sites. @tom – random Aug 10 '11 at 21:50
  • 1
    @random: That's how the system works, it doesn't display me any warning whatsoever. Also, consider the following: If I were to do randomized maintenance; I would also flood the front page, so you want us to do no maintenance at all? Really, that will have a negative impact on the site in the long run. If you think a title is of low quality, you are free to improve it. If you think all questions are that way, feel free to start a meta question to get to a standard for titles so that prolific editors have a guideline... – Tamara Wijsman Aug 10 '11 at 21:56
  • @Tom, thanks for the edits. I fully support the effort and let me know if you're going to do it again and we can split the load. – n0pe Aug 10 '11 at 21:58
  • 1
    @MaxMackie: I'm going to wait until the other meta question I seem to have skipped gets an accepted / official / highly upvoted response, if it gets one. From there on I'll see what I have to do in order to not hit the toes of fellow community members; remember, all I want is to do good so this shouldn't naturally react in comments that say the exact opposite. If it's not titles, it's tags; if it's not tags, it's improving posts with pictures; and so on... – Tamara Wijsman Aug 10 '11 at 22:02
  • 2
    For what it's worth, I think it's absolutely important to make our most viewed questions better and more representative. In the long run, I don't care about the front page as much as about the quality of the site. Go @Tom! – slhck Aug 10 '11 at 22:05
  • 2
    There must be an election going on somewhere – random Aug 11 '11 at 12:57
  • 1
    I just wanted to throw in my (Meta question)[meta.stackexchange.com/questions/102012/… : IMHO, editing old questions is something that NEEDS to be done for the good of the site... and if a user is willing to give up their time and do loads, fair enough - however, for small edits like this, there needs to be a way to stop it from going to the top, as I agree it really look spammy on the front page. At the moment, it is a necessary evil! – William Hilsum Aug 24 '11 at 9:20

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .