8

I answered a question, and since the question was of a real interest to me (I noticed the same thing on my own system and thought it might be malware), researched it further. It turned out my answer was incorrect.

So I went ahead and edited it, basically replacing it with a new answer. Is this a kosher thing to do? My older, incorrect answer was already upvoted... Maybe I should have deleted it and posted a new one?

4

A few remarks regarding your motivation:

Be aware that some up votes are not following a thorough investigation of your answer. For some users, it's good enough if the answer sounds good. Your post can be totally and provably wrong even if quite a few users agree with you.

In my opinion, a single up vote isn't enough to warrant special consideration. Your edit gives the user the opportunity to reconsider the vote anyway, as votes can be changed after an edit. If the answer was accepted, and therefore stands out as "This actually helped someone", it might be different.

In a way, leaving wrong information directly visible, even though someone liked it (for whatever reason), pollutes the web. We endeavor to create a useful source of correct information on the web. If the information in your post is wrong, just remove it.

Previous versions of your answers are archived anyway until the end to time and anyone can access them by clicking the edited link below the post.

Of course, if your intention is completely removing the original post so nobody except 10k+ users and diamond moderators can read it (and laugh about you), nuking that answer and creating a new one is the only way to do this.


My suggestions for the implementation

Simply edit your post. If you still want to make a previous version of your answer more visible, you can also add a simple reference to it to your completely revised answer. You can link to specific revisions of a post:

  • Click the edited link below the post
  • You see a list of revisions. There's a chain link symbol next to each. Click it, and you go to that revisions permanent address.
  • Copy the URL and link to it in whatever form you you deem appropriate, e.g.

(Here's tons of correct information you carefully researched)

This answer was very different (and actually not correct) in the beginning. See here for the original version.

If you want to be really thorough, as I like to be in Meta discussions when revising my answers, you can record the up/down votes at the time of the edit as e.g. +1/-0. This allows others to judge the value of your edited post.

(The example's a question, I know. Didn't find a good example quickly)

  • To clarify, as I forgot a winking smiley face there: Anybody who's been on this site for more than a few days knows how useful the editing functionality is. As more information (e.g. as part of comments, or your own research) is made available to you, editing your own post is a great way to make this additional information more easily visible. And if you learn that you were wrong at first, there's no shame in editing and correcting your post. So nobody will laugh about your previous wrong conclusions, even if they're preserved in a post's history. We've all been in the same situation before. – Daniel Beck Nov 12 '11 at 13:14
1

If I was in your situation, since someone already upvoted the answer, I would have inserted the corrections above and then added a line, like the one shown below, after that to separate the previous information.

I'm thinking that it's better to leave the previous information in place (which is also the result of your hard work) since the upvote may indicate that the previous answer was useful to someone.

----- Previous answer follows -----

(Previous answer text goes here.)

  • 1
    Quite a bit of care needs to be taken with this approach, as it often just leads to several "Edit: Oh by the way, here's something totally different:" sections in a post. – Daniel Beck Nov 12 '11 at 11:03
  • 2
    Yes, I don't like seeing that either. As a visitor of such a Q/A, I'd just like to read one consistent answer. I probably don't want to be forced to see the revisions unless they're really necessary – at least to me, that looks unprofessional. Just make it look consistent. – slhck Nov 12 '11 at 11:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .