4

Here is an example (Tom's count went down).

Beginning: enter image description here

End: enter image description here

It almost seems like I "stole" reviews from Tom, but that would be strange.

11
  • why post this again? new /review reviewed count bug
    – Sathyajith Bhat Mod
    Jul 16, 2012 at 3:59
  • Different bug. Here, the count went backwards. There, the count did not add correctly
    – soandos
    Jul 16, 2012 at 3:59
  • I gotta ask. Is this really that big of a deal? Jul 16, 2012 at 5:43
  • 1
    @KronoS, nope, but it is a bug, and I have no idea how much havoc that can cause under other circumstances.
    – soandos
    Jul 16, 2012 at 5:51
  • While this is on-topic for Meta.SU, I suggest that you make these requests/bug reports onto Meta.SO as these are more of a general system reporting and not particularly related solely to Super User. This actually has it's own post where people are already reporting bugs and requesting features. Jul 16, 2012 at 6:19
  • 1
    This is the crap queue. Chances are, deleted posts don't count towards the total (which is a bad idea, but conceivable).
    – Daniel Beck Mod
    Jul 16, 2012 at 6:29
  • @KronoS, those are suggestions. This is a bug (though by all means, if a mod wants to migrate it, please do so)
    – soandos
    Jul 16, 2012 at 15:10
  • @soandos I talked to Rebecca Chernoff and she said that bugs are being reported there as well. Jul 16, 2012 at 15:17
  • Flagging for migration then. Thanks for the update.
    – soandos
    Jul 16, 2012 at 15:19
  • While all the comments above may be true, MSU is as valid a Meta as MSO. I'm sure soandos got the message that he should post /review specific feedback on the said post, but other than that MSU is just that: Meta. There's no real difference
    – Ivo Flipse
    Jul 16, 2012 at 20:34
  • @ivoflipse I completely agree that these are valid and on topic here I was more trying to keep these in one place. Also MSO gets more traffic for these sort of things. Jul 17, 2012 at 4:59

1 Answer 1

2

Before we implemented client-side review throttling, it was more common for reviews to be invalidated server-side several minutes after they were submitted. You shouldn't observe this behavior any more.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .